IT’S never easy to give or receive bad news. The vast majority of us have been on either side at some point, and whether you are the one imparting or receiving it, the same basic principle applies: honesty is the best policy.
Clarity and tone are important too, of course, if the human brain is to start processing difficult, often overwhelming information. Simple language, delivered calmly and directly, has the best chance of sinking in.
Honesty, clarity, calmness and directness have never been more vital than now, as we try to take in the enormity of the coronavirus crisis and its consequences. And yet many of our leaders are showing themselves to be woefully, shamefully, sometimes even deliberately incapable of giving straight answers to some of the most fundamental questions.
The public accepts that scientists and medics do not yet understand every facet and quirk of this virus. But there is simply no excuse for the disgraceful lack of honestly and clarity around many issues that politicians can control.
If ever there was a time for politicians be direct with people, this is it. We do not want obsequiousness, we do not need the pill to be sugar-coated. Don’t patronise or insult us. Just tell it like it is, even when it’s bad. Especially when it's bad. Be honest when ministers get stuff wrong, or when they don’t know the answer to something. Be up front when the system is struggling to cope; tell us what work is being done to remedy failures and give us a realistic assessment of whether the action will be successful.
READ MORE: Home Secretary ‘sorry if people feel there have been failings over PPE supply’
We badly need a new, more direct approach, particularly from the UK Government, one that is better able to encompass the eye-popping statistics and harsh truths created by coronavirus.
The current information vacuum grows more worrying by the day. After all, there is still no reliable death toll, no UK or Scottish stats that include care home and community deaths as well as those that took place in hospital. Grieving relatives are left to tell their stories on social media, devastated that their loved-one’s death doesn’t seem to count, distressed at the lack of knowledge or discussion around care home guidelines.
There is still no honest or plausible explanation for why so few coronavirus tests are taking place, or why tracing – which has helped Germany and South Korea keep deaths down – was abandoned so early on. It cannot be unrelated that no minister or official dares to explain why the death toll in the UK is on course to surpass that of Italy and Spain, despite having had more time to prepare. People in England are dying of Covid-19 at 2.5 times the rate of Ireland, which has a comparable number of ICU beds per head of population.
Theses and explanations already exist, of course, but are not judged by politicians to be politically expedient or comfortable. And that’s how you end up with the likes of Home Secretary Priti Patel, the coldest fish this side of Greenland, issuing a textbook false apology – “I’m sorry if YOU feel there are failings” – at a recent daily briefing. This chastising tone is an insult to us all, not least the dead and bereaved.
Indeed, the defensive insults are starting to stack up. Over the weekend Ms Patel’s cabinet colleague Matt Hancock, the Health Secretary, made the contemptuous suggestion that the continuing shortage of personal protective equipment at the frontline could be down to doctors and nurses over-using it.
And while some sections of the media choose to focus unhealthy amounts of attention on one particularly well-known Covid-19 patient, offering a running commentary on his recovery complete with sudoku, texts from his girlfriend and the films he is watching from his hospital bed, it is left to others to highlight the far bigger tragedies already emerging from this crisis.
As Newsnight presenter Emily Maitlis pointed out in a blistering attack on the patronising and “misleading” language being used by some ministers during the crisis, we are not all in this together. Boris Johnson needing hospital treatment does not make coronavirus a “great leveller”.
READ MORE: Priti Patel aide 'received £25k payout after suicide attempt over bullying'
We already know that black and ethnic minority citizens are more likely to become seriously ill. Children from our poorest communities are suffering most from being off school. Their parents will be among the hardest hit as the economic ramifications play out in the weeks, months and years to come.
The least we deserve is straight talk. Without it, this crisis risks turning into a catastrophe.
Shops across Scotland are closing. Newspaper sales are falling. But we’ve chosen to keep our coverage of the coronavirus crisis free because it’s so important for the people of Scotland to stay informed during this difficult time.
However, producing The Herald's unrivalled analysis, insight and opinion on a daily basis still costs money, and we need your support to sustain our trusted, quality journalism.
To help us get through this, we’re asking readers to take a digital subscription to The Herald. You can sign up now for just £2 for two months.
If you choose to sign up, we’ll offer a faster loading, advert-light experience – and deliver a digital version of the print product to your device every day.
Click here to help The Herald:
https://www.heraldscotland.com/subscribe/
Thank you
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel