Belgravia****
(STV)
THE merchant’s wife gazed out of the window, troubled. “How strange,” she mused, “that we should be discussing a ball when we are on the brink of war. How ridiculous!”
Not at all, my dear. Everyone needs a little escapism and for many this latest work of galloping frippery from Julian “Downton Abbey” Fellowes, has not arrived a moment too soon.
Based on Fellowes’ novel of the same name, Belgravia opened in Brussels, 1915. Napoleon was on his way, society was all a flutter, and James Trenchard (Philip Glenister) was doing a roaring trade keeping the British troops supplied in food and ale.
Trenchard had wangled invitations to the Duchess of Richmond’s ball. His wife Anne (Tamsin Greig) feared the family, being from the mere middle classes, had no place at such a grand occasion. The Duchess (Diana Kent) agreed. “I’ve invited a merchant supplier to my ball!” she gasped on spying them.
As the Trenchard’s daughter Sophia danced the night away with a young aristocrat, Anne’s lips pursed ever tighter. Sure enough, when the young lord whispered to Sophia that they were the luckiest couple alive, you just knew trouble was coming down the tracks. So it proved when the story fast forwarded a couple of decades and we learned what had happened after the ball was over.
As with Downton Abbey, Belgravia is all about class and wealth: who has it, who doesn’t, and who wants it. Here, it is the grocers and the builders, the self-made men, who are on their way up, and the nobs don’t like it. Nor do the servants, judging by the gossip downstairs at the Trenchard’s home in Belgravia, “this spangled city for the rich” as another duchess calls it.
Belgravia is positively hoaching with duchesses, and terrific actresses. Greig and Harriet Walter, playing Lady Brockenhurst, are at the centre of the tale, two very different women united by a life-changing event.
Slyly humorous and nicely melodramatic, Belgravia is not quite Downton standard yet - Downton took a while to be Downton standard - but the signs are good.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel