THE quango that gave the go-ahead to a disastrous ferry contract has denied it holds any responsibility for the fiasco.
Bosses at Caledonian Maritime Assets Ltd (CMAL) insisted they did nothing wrong and blamed “new management” at Ferguson Marine shipyard.
They accused billionaire Jim McColl, whose Clyde Blowers empire owned the yard, of giving “disingenuous” evidence to an ongoing Holyrood inquiry.
And they said the yard’s bosses had been “designing as they went along" – leading to “many mistakes that have to be rectified".
Ferguson Marine in Port Glasgow was handed a £97 million contract to build two new CalMac ferries in 2015.
But delays and disputes have seen the total cost spiral to around £250m, while the vessels will be around four years late.
The calamitous contract eventually saw Ferguson fall into administration before it was nationalised last year.
Holyrood's Rural Economy and Connectivity Committee is now probing how the contract went so badly wrong.
CMAL is a Scottish Government-owned firm that procures ferries for use by operator CalMac.
James Anderson, director of vessels at CMAL, said the quango made Transport Scotland aware of its concerns as early as March 2016.
He told the inquiry he had no regrets over handing Ferguson the contract ahead of five other bidders, adding: “Something went wrong after we signed the contract.”
He said: “This was a failure of management, of new management.”
Mr Anderson also rejected any suggestion it was CMAL’s responsibility, adding: “We’re just going about our normal business, which we’re highly skilled in, and we’ve delivered.”
Earlier, he told MSPs the ships were “standard engineering”, but said workers had been asked to start building the vessels before designs were finalised.
In written evidence, CMAL said the vessel “superstructures” were initially supposed to have been fabricated off-site and shipped to the yard by barge, but that methodology was not ultimately followed.
Mr Anderson said: “The yard go ahead, they send out the drawings, as was reported in an early evidence session by the workforce.
“The workforce were even telling the shipyard, the bosses, ‘This isn’t right.’ And what were they told? ‘Crack on.’ That was it."
He later told MSPs: “I find it really just incredible that we’re even having this conversation – how these people behaved.”
Mr Anderson earlier took aim at managers in the yard, as opposed to the owners.
He said: “These people have already been mentioned. The word ‘bullying’ came up at one of the other sessions.”
He said Ferguson Marine had insisted everything was fine up until mid-2017.
It then made a claim for an extra £17 million “out of nowhere”.
Mr Anderson said: “I’ll never, ever forget that meeting, for a long, long time, when me and my projects director went in with someone we had never met before from the parent company, the CEO, the project manager, and the chief naval architect.
“The project manager and the chief naval architect couldn’t even look at us. They couldn’t even look at us, because they knew what was coming.
“They couldn’t even look me in the eye because they didn’t believe it themselves. They knew it wasn’t to be true.”
Kevin Hobbs, chief executive officer of CMAL, said bosses at Ferguson were “designing as they went along”, and accused them of “not being truthful”.
He said: “They were sending drawings out on to the shipyard floor, for construction, without sign-off by us…and that is a major part of the failure.
“That then means that the blocks and ultimately the vessel has many mistakes that have to be rectified."
Mr Hobbs rejected claims from Mr McColl that the price of the two vessels was announced by First Minister Nicola Sturgeon prior to the agreement of that figure by the shipyard.
He said: “The chronology of that is not correct.”
He added: “We had the final negotiated stamped payment schedule, which you have access to, which came in on August 27.
“The First Minister announced it on August 31.
“Obviously you’ve listened to evidence from other people, and I think quite a lot of that evidence is disingenuous.”
He said the £17m claim was "a work of fiction".
Elsewhere, he said £30 million of public money was paid out for work that was never completed.
In written evidence to the Holyrood inquiry, CMAL previously said Ferguson Marine had "insufficient manpower" and ran out of money because it started building the vessels before their design was finalised.
Mr McColl, a member of Ms Sturgeon's Council of Economic Advisers, has claimed he was "shafted" by the Scottish Government and called for a full public inquiry.
The two new dual-fuel CalMac ferries at the centre of the controversy are earmarked for Arran and the Hebrides.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel