There are calls for Home Secretary Priti Patel to face Parliament over the resignation of Home Office civil servant Sir Philip Rutnam amid bullying accusations.
Labour leadership candidate Sir Keir Starmer called on Ms Patel to explain the explosive allegations levelled against her by Sir Philip.
The Home Office’s permanent secretary quit on Saturday after accusing Ms Patel of orchestrating a “vicious” campaign against him, of lying about her involvement in it and of creating a climate of fear in her department.
Sir Keir said: “The Home Secretary has a duty to come to Parliament on Monday to explain the allegations made about her own conduct.”
READ MORE: Priti Patel under pressure after top civil servant quits with stinging attack on Home Secretary
He has also called for Cabinet Secretary Mark Sedwill to start “an immediate investigation” into the circumstances surrounding Sir Philip’s departure.
“There are now urgent questions that must be answered and steps that need to be taken,” he added.
Sir Philip’s resignation also led to calls from opposition MPs and the senior public servants’ trade union for the Prime Minister to put a stop to what they claim is a campaign by his chief adviser Dominic Cummings to undermine the civil service.
It comes two weeks after Sajid Javid quit as Chancellor when the PM ordered him to fire his team of aides.
In his statement, Sir Philip said the campaign against him included “false” claims that he had briefed the media against the Home Secretary.
He said: “The Home Secretary categorically denied any involvement in this campaign to the Cabinet Office.
“I regret I do not believe her. She has not made the effort I would expect to dissociate herself from the comments.
“Even despite this campaign I was willing to effect a reconciliation with the Home Secretary.
“But despite my efforts to engage with her, Priti Patel has made no effort to engage with me to discuss this.
“I believe these events give me very strong grounds to claim constructive, unfair dismissal and I will be pursuing that claim in the courts.
Sir Philip said his experience “has been extreme but I consider there is evidence it was part of a wider pattern of behaviour.
“One of my duties as Permanent Secretary was to protect the health, safety and well-being of our 35,000 people.
“This created tension with the Home Secretary, and I have encouraged her to change her behaviours.
“I have received allegations that her conduct has included shouting and swearing, belittling people, making unreasonable and repeated demands – behaviour that created fear and that needed some bravery to call out.
“I know that resigning in this way will have serious implications for me personally – the Cabinet Office offered me a financial settlement that would have avoided this outcome.
“I am aware that there will continue to be briefing against me now I have made this decision, but I am hopeful that at least it may not now be directed towards my colleagues or the department.
“This has been a very difficult decision but I hope that my stand may help in maintaining the quality of Government in our country – which includes hundreds of thousands of civil servants, loyally dedicated to delivering this Government’s agenda.”
Cabinet Secretary Sir Mark issued a brief statement about two hours after Sir Philip quit saying he had accepted his resignation “with great regret” and adding: “I thank him for his long and dedicated career of public service.
READ MORE: Sir Philip Rutnam quits saying he intends to sue the government
“Shona Dunn, the Second Permanent Secretary at the Home Office responsible for borders, immigration and citizenship, will become Acting Permanent Secretary with immediate effect,” Sir Mark said.
“The Home Office’s vital work to keep our citizens safe and our country secure continues uninterrupted.”
Shadow chancellor John McDonnell, asked if Ms Patel could stay in her post, told Sky News’ Sophy Ridge on Sunday: “I can’t see it, it’s bizarre.”
He added: “One of the ways the Prime Minister could go forward is to have an independent investigation but during that period you’d have to suspend the Home Secretary whilst that went on.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel