PRITI Patel is a "demanding" boss but she is not a bully, one of her senior Home Office colleagues said following a series of claims about feuding at the top of her department.
Ms Patel has expressed her concern at "false allegations" that she says are being made about her amid claims she clashed with senior officials, belittled colleagues and is distrusted by intelligence chiefs.
An ally said the Home Secretary was "absolutely livid" about the recent slew of allegations and insisted she was demanding a leak inquiry to be carried out by the Cabinet Office.
READ MORE: Gordon Brown backs Jackie Baillie as next Scottish Labour deputy
However, Cabinet Office sources were adamant that a request had not been received either formally or informally yet.
Security Minister James Brokenshire described the reports as "absolute nonsense".
He conceded that there is "huge frustration" across the Home Office around some of the "false assertions that have been made publicly" about Ms Patel.
"I don't accept those assertions that have been seen in the press about the Home Secretary," he told Sky News.
"Yes, she is demanding, but in that role you have to be because you are dealing with some of the most sensitive, some of the most challenging things that you have to deal with across Government.
"I think the Home Secretary is absolutely focused on the public good, the agenda that we've set around policing, on immigration and indeed around counter-terrorism and security."
The Government on Sunday moved to strongly deny claims that MI5 chiefs do not trust Ms Patel and were limiting intelligence sharing.
The latest allegation came after she was accused of bullying officials and creating an "atmosphere of fear" at the department, which allies denied.
READ MORE: Priti Patel dismisses claims Meghan has faced racist press coverage
And it emerged last week that Ms Patel had tried to move permanent secretary Sir Philip Rutnam from her department after they had a series of rows.
A Home Office spokesman said: "The Home Secretary and permanent secretary are deeply concerned about the number of false allegations appearing in the media.
"They are focused on delivering on the Home Office's hugely important agenda, which includes creating an immigration system that works for the UK, putting more police on the streets and keeping the public safe from terrorism."
The security services were dragged into the row when the Sunday Times reported officials alleging intelligence chiefs do "not trust" her and have decided to share less intelligence with her.
A Government spokesman responded: "The Home Secretary and MI5 have a strong and close working relationship, and baseless claims to the contrary are both wrong and against the public interest.
"The Home Secretary receives the same daily intelligence briefings as her predecessors, and no information is being withheld."
An ally said Ms Patel asked the Cabinet Office's director-general of propriety and ethics, Helen MacNamara, to carry out a formal leak inquiry.
But the ally said that Ms MacNamara has so far blocked the attempt.
This, however, was quickly denied by Cabinet Office sources who moved to say no request had been made to Ms MacNamara.
Tory former Cabinet minister Theresa Villiers claimed there was an element of misogyny in the briefings against Ms Patel, telling BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "I'm sick of spiteful briefings against women in high public office.
"It happens again and again and I don't believe these allegations against Priti Patel.
"I think she's a highly effective Home Secretary and I think whoever is making these briefings should stop it because I think they are unfair and they are damaging."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel