ADMIRERS eulogise about its qualities, it's regarded by many as the architect's finest work and yet for decades a Glasgow masterpiece has been mired in protracted disputes, writes Drew Sandelands.
Masked by scaffolding, the rundown Egyptian Halls is now viewed as an "ongoing sore" on the city's streetscape.
Its owners say the building is at risk of structural collapse, the council disagrees. Progress, if there's been any, has been slow.
However, campaigners are determined to change the fortunes of Alexander 'Greek' Thomson's Union Street gem.
More than 50 people, including heritage professionals, visited another Glasgow landmark, Charles Rennie Mackintosh's The Lighthouse, to take part in an event, arranged by the Alexander Thomson Society, to "kickstart productive discussions".
Europa Nostra, a pan-Europan heritage organisation, has shortlisted the building for its seven ‘Most Endangered’ programme, a campaign to raise awareness and push for action on at-risk monuments.
The Thomson Society is hopeful this campaign will lead to action, and understands the Egyptian Halls' owners could be willing to sell.
The upper floors and ground floor are owned by separate companies – Union Street Developments and Union Street Properties – both run by Dundee businessman Derek Souter, alongside his brother Duncan and Kelvin Kerr.
"Voluntary sale is the society's preferred option but a detailed cost plan and business case is needed prior to this being considered," he explained.
However, the society and the owners have "very different" estimations of the building's value.
Mr Souter confirmed they are open to selling the building but said his valuation is "private and confidential" and based on a 22-year investment. The society has been granted preferred bidder status but doesn't "have any money".
A successful Europa Nostra bid will see a delegation of heritage bodies from across Europe visit and provide a detailed report on the building. They would also assess whether there's a viable solution.
If the bid isn't successful, the Thomson Society still wants heritage groups to help with funding a feasibility study, identifying whether alternative ownership is possible.
The owners have come up with four options for the Halls but say preservation is "all but impossible to achieve", with facade retention or demolition most likely.
Mr Abercrombie said: "Without public funding, the owners have stated the only viable option for them is demolition."
A Glasgow City Council spokesman said: "Our position on the future of the Egyptian Halls remains the same: we await proposals which show an appropriate and sustainable use for this building, which is absolutely a notable part of Glasgow’s built and architectural heritage."
The Thomson Society also recently launched a 'Re-imaging Egyptian Halls' competition to find ideas for the building's future use.
There was 21 entries from across the world, including the USA, India, Brazil, Russia, the Philippines, Slovenia and China.
Proposals include a Museum of Slavery, a school of architecture, a primary school or a public space. They're available to view on the society's website, with a public vote now open.
The heritage event saw speeches from Niall Murphy, from Glasgow City Heritage Trust, on the city's commercial architecture, architect Fiona Sinclair on 'Lost Thomson' and Ben Adam, from David Narro Associates, on the conservation approach to structural engineering.
Dara Parsons, of Historic Environment Scotland, spoke about protecting and developing Scotland's built heritage and Andrew McDonnell, from Glasgow Building Preservation Trust, talked about the trust's work.
Jamie McNamara, from the Society for the Protection of Ancient Buildings, spoke about rescuing and reusing buildings to conclude proceedings.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel