From St Kilda’s puffins to the gannets of Bass Rock, Scotland’s seabird colonies are among its most enduring and striking natural icons, drawing visitors from around the world.
Yet it was feared many of these species could be at risk of disappearing altogether, with previous data suggesting populations have plummeted since the mid-1980s.
Now, however, hopes are rising that the decrease may in fact be slowing down - thanks in part to the eradication of rats and American mink.
The latest biodiversity indicator published by Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) shows that seabird numbers, which declined by more than 30 per cent from 1986 to 2011, have since remained fairly stable.
- CLIMATE FOR CHANGE: All of the latest stories on the environment
And increases have been recorded at colonies where rats have been removed, such as the Shiants and Canna, benefitting species like the puffin.
SNH identified the removal of rats and American mink, which are predators to breeding seabirds, as “a crucial step” in boosting populations and securing them for the future.
However, its experts have also stressed that more data is needed if longer term trends are to be understood and lasting change achieved.
Simon Foster, SNH’s Trends & Indicator Analyst, said: “Seabirds are long-lived, for example the oldest guillemot in Scotland (and the rest of the UK) was recaptured on the Isle of Canna last summer being at least 41 years old.
“In Wales a razorbill was recorded at 42 years old, while a Manx shearwater has been found more than 50 years old.
“Clearly we need long-term data to really understand what is happening to different species, and the fantastic work by volunteers undertaking monitoring at colonies around Scotland is invaluable in providing us with a unique picture on these changes.”
Only two species, the common gull and common tern, maintained or increased in breeding numbers over the study period.
The Arctic skua, whose breeding stronghold is the Northern Isles, has experienced the largest decline.
In fact, the UK Red listed bird - known as the “pirates of the seabird world” because they steal their food from other seabirds - has suffered a 78% drop in its population.
Their decrease has been linked to changes in the availability of sandeels, which has also affected Northern Isles populations of kittiwakes and terns.
Drops are also apparent for herring gull and great-black backed gulls across Scotland.
However, while below earlier levels, there are signs of some populations, such as the guillemot and black-legged kittiwake, stabilising, with some colonies showing increases.
Common tern and Arctic tern numbers have gone up since the last report. Terns are known to be highly variable in breeding numbers and it is too early to say if this trend is going to continue.
Scotland’s breeding seabirds are of international importance. A total of 24 species of seabird regularly breed in Scotland and they are not only vulnerable to changes in the country’s seas.
Many migrate across the Atlantic and technology is beginning to improve scientists’ understanding of their movements.
A UK wide seabird census is currently underway and the results from this will help to provide an overview on all of the species of seabirds breeding around Scotland.
Offering grounds for hope, Mr Foster said that puffins, one of the country’s most popular marine species, were among the biggest winners after the eradication of predators.
He also highlighted early signs that populations of wading birds have received a boost following the removal of mink.
“On the islands where eradications have happened, we are seeing population increases for some species,” he said.
“Primarily its the chicks and eggs they predate on but for birds that burrow, like puffins, they predate the adults as well.
“We have seen increases for puffins on the Shiants and also big increases for puffins on Canna after the removal of rats.
“American mink have also been an issue, particularly on the islands around Argyll and the west coast, but there are efforts ongoing to remove mink from these places.
“Where mink have been removed in local areas, we are seeing some improvements, not only with seabirds but with waders as well.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here