THE Prime Minister’s newest adviser once claimed it was a woman’s Christian “duty” to have sex with her husband, according to reports.
Andrew Sabisky - who resigned last night following days of rows - made the comments on Reddit, where he seemingly acted as an agony uncle to posters on the site’s popular sex forum, doling out advice on rape fantasies, incest, Christianity, and other subjects.
According to reports in our sister paper The National, in one post, from seven years ago, a man explained that his Mormon wife was reluctant to have sex with him and asked for advice.
Under the username thedovelamenting, Sabisky responded by urging him to try to “rewire” her brain “to the point where she no longer, consciously or subconsciously sees a conflict between a good Christian woman and serving you up 39 flavours of slut on command”.
He added: “It ought to be obvious that her wifely duty ought to consist not just of letting you masturbate into her vagina but actively playing her part in building a fantastic sex life with you.
"Yes, that might require pushing through some initial mental discomfort but it is simply selfish and unchristian of her not to make the effort.”
READ MORE: Downing Street adviser Andrew Sabisky resigns amid criticism over eugenics comments
Sabisky then urged the man to “take the lead a little bit more”.
He said: “Theologically speaking she is your wife and should submit to you as unto the Lord, so if you want doggy then it is your place to command her to get on her hands and knees and her place to obey.”
He added: “If you want a blow job you should get one because she is your wife and lover … She’s just being selfish really (which isn’t very Christian).”
In another post, he recommended that a 26-year-old man looking to lose his virginity pay “lots of money for a really good hooker”.
When a woman posted about finding “disturbing porn” on her boyfriend’s computer, including erotic fiction about incest, paedophilia and rape, Sabisky told her he didn't “see all that much to worry about here”.
He added: “Fantasies are strange things. Unpredictable, of uncertain origin, hard to figure how they’ll relate to real life. I have a thing for incest erotica myself despite never having had those fantasies relating to my actual family. So long as he’s not actually breaking any laws and is restricting his viewing habits to girls 18 and up I wouldn’t be too squicked.”
He then suggested the woman was at fault for not offering her partner the right “kind of sex”, though he admits he “could be way off there.”
The Reddit posts were deleted soon after The National approached Sabisky for a comment.
Yesterday Downing Street was criticised for refusing to distance themselves from the adviser’s past remarks on eugenics and race.
Sabisky had reportedly suggested black people have lower IQs than white people and claimed compulsory contraception could prevent “creating a permanent underclass”.
The 27-year-old was appointed to the unspecified "contractor" role at the heart of government after responding to an advert placed by Johnson’s chief adviser Dominic Cummings calling for “misfits and weirdos” to come and work at Number 10.
Late on a Monday, Sabisky tweeted that he had quit – though The Sun's political editor, Tom Newton Dunn disputed this account and said he understood the aide had in fact been fired.
READ MORE: NO 10 refuses to clarify if PM agrees with aide that black people mentally inferior to whites
Sabisky tweeted: “The media hysteria about my old stuff online is mad but I wanted to help HMG not be a distraction. Accordingly I’ve decided to resign as a contractor. I hope no.10 hires more ppl w/ good geopolitical forecasting track records & that media learn to stop selective quoting
“I know this will disappoint a lot of ppl but I signed up to do real work, not be in the middle of a giant character assassination: if I can’t do the work properly there’s no point, & I have a lot of other things to do w/ my life”.
This article was originally published in pro-independence our sister paper, The National
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel