Safety fears over Edinburgh's controversial Christmas market were hushed up by both the city council and events organiser in the days before it opened to the public.
Emails released through freedom of information laws showed former Scottish Tory leader Ruth Davidson called for assurances over public safety four days before it opened.
Visitors flocked to East Princes Street Gardens in the Capital on November 16 - but a completion certificate for the event’s platform was only issued on November 15.
READ MORE: Underbelly boss threatened to 'cancel Hogmanay' over Edinburgh council concerns
The Edinburgh Evening News reported Edinburgh MSP Ms Davidson was demanding answers from the City of Edinburgh Council, which outsources the market to events organiser Underbelly.
An email sent to her by the council’s director of place, Paul Lawrence, said: “The Christmas market will not open without all relevant safety certification, including a building warrant.
“Discussions are ongoing regarding compliance with the submitted designs and council officers are conducting a site inspection today.”
On November 6, social media users shared pictures of thin planks of wood supporting scaffolding - the same day Underbelly boss Charlie Wood threatened to pull the plug on both the market and Hogmanay events.
At the time, Underbelly insisted ‘the installation in the East Gardens is safe’ - although David Givan, a service manager in the council’s planning and building standards department, wrote to David Watson, Underbelly’s head of production, raising concerns.
Mr Girvan wrote: “From what we have seen from photographs on social media it appears that (at least some) of the scaffolding support structure has not been constructed in accordance with the warrant drawings.”
But the council also tried to assuage concerns by saying that an application for a building warrant demonstrated “compliance with the regulations” and was “currently being assessed”.
Emails released through freedom of information laws show that privately, relations between the two parties were fraught amid safety concerns.
On November 7, Mr Girvan wrote to Underbelly boss Mr Woods again - warning “it is essential that you address any of the requirements that [officer] sets out”.
Mr Givan added: “At present, works are being carried out without a building warrant and without planning permission.
“I consider that the steps I have set out above and in my email to David Watson of yesterday to be very reasonable given these circumstances.”
And an internal email sent to council staff by a senior officer warned: “Again, no compromise on trees, building warrants or wider public safety.
“This thing cannot open unless all professional staff are in agreement that it is safe.”
Councillors have called for greater transparency.
Green councillor Claire Miller deemed it a ‘fiasco’ and added: “Even as an elected member of this Council, with my access to council staff and information, it has been incredibly hard to piece together what’s happened, so I can only imagine how baffling it must seem to members of the public.
“I’m already thinking ahead to this year’s festive events, and I’m asking the Council administration and officers to ensure we completely avoid a repeat of this fiasco, with totally clear and accountable decision-making processes.”
And Lib Dem councillor Hal Osler said: “There is nothing about this in any way shape or form that is putting anyone in any good light.
“What I would like to see is total clarity and understanding of what happened and who knew and why so we can make sure this does not happen again.
“It is extremely disappointing because I expect a truthful response from officers and I don’t expect people to be economical with the truth.
“You can understand why residents are losing faith in the council because so am I.”
A spokesman for the City of Edinburgh Council said: “There was an ongoing dialogue between the department and the applicant to make sure the structures were safe and fully compliant before the market opened to the public.
“Any concerns raised were fully checked and actioned as part of this process.
READ MORE: Anger as gardens left a mudbath by Edinburgh's Christmas market
“We were clear throughout that the site would not open under any circumstances until all necessary conditions had been met.”
An Underbelly spokesman said; “Safety is always Underbelly’s first priority.
“The structure in East Princes Street Gardens was built and completed in accordance with its specification, and as agreed with the council’s engineers and Underbelly’s independent engineers, and received a building warrant in the proper manner.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel