Scottish salmon faces “huge unnecessary burdens” due to the Brexit deal being pursued by the UK Government, according to the trade body for the sector.
Exports to the EU do not need Export Health Certificates (EHCs) because of the free movement of goods within the union.
READ MORE: Scotland's salmon crisis: why our own rivers could be killing the king of fish
However, the UK Government’s decision not to align with EU regulations in the future has caused concerns that EHCs will be needed once the transition period ends on December 31.
The Scottish Salmon Producers Organisation (SSPO) estimates the cost of the added measures for Scottish farmed salmon will be between £1.3 million and £8.7 million per year.
Julie Hesketh-Laird, chief executive of the SSPO, said: “Scottish farmed salmon is the UK’s biggest food export.
“We now send more than £190 million worth of salmon to France, a third of our total exports.
“Once in the main French markets, the salmon can then be dispatched to almost anywhere in the EU.
“We deal in a perishable product so it is crucial for the thousands of loyal customers we have in the EU that we get our fresh fish to key markets as quickly and smoothly as possible.”
The added costs would depend on the amount charged by councils for each EHC and the number required per lorry load.
The SSPO also predicts it could mean the processing and signing of an extra 50,000 to 100,000 certificates every year.
Each one has to be signed by either an environmental health officer or a vet, meaning extra staff would be needed at the main haulage distribution hub, the DFDS base at Larkhall in South Lanarkshire, and delays and hold-ups in the dispatch of salmon to the continent.
Ms Hesketh-Laird added: “We are appealing to the UK Government to make this a priority in negotiations with the EU.
READ MORE: Demand for farmed salmon is 'causing an ecological disaster'
“We want both sides to commit to allow seafood trade to the EU to continue as it is now, without the imposition of any new tariff or non-tariff barriers and we want UK ministers to call for this in negotiations.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel