AMERICA has warned Britain Huawei poses a "real risk" to security as Mike Pompeo, the US Secretary of State, arrived in London for Downing St talks.
Mr Pompeo insisted the tech giant was "an extension of the Chinese Communist Party" and Washington would "evaluate" the UK's decision.
His comments came just 24 hours after Boris Johnson gave the green light to Huawei having a limited role in the country's 5G network.
The Prime Minister has insisted allowing the Chinese firm involvement in the next generation of telecommunications would not damage transatlantic security co-operation.
The company, with close links to the Communist Government in Beijing, has always rejected claims it represents a security risk.
But speaking to reporters on the plane to the UK, Mr Pompeo, who will have talks with Mr Johnson and Dominic Raab, the Foriegn Secretary, said: "Our view of Huawei has been that putting it in your system creates real risk.
"This is an extension of the Chinese Communist Party with a legal requirement to hand over information to the Chinese Communist Party."
He added that "American information only should pass through trusted networks, and we'll make sure we do that" and suggested the UK could "relook" at the decision in the future.
The PM has said allowing Huawei to play a limited role in the UK's 5G infrastructure would not "imperil our relationship" with Donald Trump's administration as he faced a backlash from both Tory MPs and US Republicans.
Mr Johnson defied the US Ppresident by giving the green light to the Chinese firm despite US warnings that it could hamper intelligence-sharing with Washington and the other members of the Five Eyes alliance.
The PM, who spoke to Mr Trump on Tuesday, said the Government's decision would not damage the "extremely valuable" security co-operation with the Five Eyes alliance which includes the US.
Answering questions from the public on Facebook he said he had "interrogated" the security and intelligence agencies about the issue and whether Huawei could be allowed to play a role while preventing "any kind of risk of leaks or interference with our security".
Mr Johnson explained: "There is no doubt in their mind that we can do it and we can allow Huawei into some aspects of 5G but not compromise our intelligence-sharing ability with America, Australia, Canada or New Zealand - the so-called Five Eyes. I'm very confident we can do that."
The decision has caused deep unease on the Tory benches with discussion of a possible rebellion when the matter comes to the Commons, although the PM can now normally rely on a comfortable majority.
On Tuesday, the UK's National Security Council agreed to allow "high-risk vendors" to play a limited part in building the 5G network.
At a 90-minute meeting, Ben Wallace, the Defence Secretary, reportedly argued against the move but was said to have been a "lone voice".
Government assurances about the decision have done little to quell what Damian Green, former de facto Deputy Prime Minister under Theresa May, called "widespread [and] strong unease" on the Tory benches.
Ministers have said they will legislate at the "earliest opportunity" to put the new guidance on telecoms providers into law, opening up the prospect of a potentially damaging backbench revolt.
"One of the things that frankly surprised me was the breadth of opposition to the current stance of the Government on the Conservative back benches," Mr Green told the BBC.
"We don't know yet, when push comes to shove and votes happen, how many people will actually put their heads above the parapet but it is very widespread."
Senior Tory MPs including former leader Sir Iain Duncan Smith and ex-Brexit secretary David Davis have been among those to express displeasure.
Mr Trump has refrained from a Twitter outburst on the decision but officials in Washington said they were "disappointed by the UK's decision".
"There is no safe option for untrusted vendors to control any part of a 5G network," an official said.
A series of senior congressional figures spoke out to condemn the move.
Tom Cotton, a member of the Senate intelligence committee, said: "Allowing Huawei to build the UK's 5G networks today is like allowing the KGB to build its telephone network during the Cold War."
The European Union also unveiled security guidelines for the next generation high-speed wireless networks that stop short of banning Huawei, in a further blow to the US campaign against the firm.
Mr Pompeo's two-day visit is likely to offer the first real indication of the extent of any damage to the so-called special relationship.
The US administration has consistently argued that giving Huawei a role in 5G could allow the Chinese a "back door" into the telecoms network through which they could carry out espionage or cyber attacks.
The Government has acknowledged the tech company is not a "trusted" supplier but argues that by banning it from the most sensitive elements of the network and restricting its involvement to 35 per cent, it can manage the risks.
The clash comes at a sensitive moment in US-UK relations, just as Mr Johnson is hoping to make rapid progress on a trade deal.
The PM appears to have concluded that honouring his General Election pledge to "level up" the "left-behind" areas of the country must be the priority.
Rolling out 5G across the country is regarded as key to improving economic performance and excluding Huawei would mean delays and higher costs.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here