Businesses in rural Scotland could find it easier to attract foreign workers post-Brexit under a plan unveiled by the UK Government’s immigration adviser to pilot a work visa scheme tailored to help more remote areas.
In a new report, the Migration Advisory Committee [MAC] recommended cutting the salary threshold for skilled migrants from £30,000 to £25,600 for those coming to the UK with a job offer.
However, it ruled out introducing a specific lower pay threshold for Scotland or any other part of the UK, saying there should be a “single national salary threshold”, which would take a similar approach to the operation of the national minimum wage.
It pointed out that regional salary thresholds could also be harder to enforce within the migration system because the UK was geographically small, making it easy for a migrant to live in one region and work in another.
READ MORE: SNP slated after forcing debate on European flag at Holyrood
Their report explained salaries did vary by geography with earnings being higher in London than the UK average; by around a quarter. In Wales and Northern Ireland people had lower earnings; by around 10 per cent. But in Scotland they were similar to the UK as a whole.
However, the MAC accepted there could be a case for special treatment for rural areas, which might “face more complex challenges in recruitment and retention of workers”.
It said: “There should be a separate pilot visa for ‘remote’ areas of the UK, part of which could be lower salary thresholds for migrants into those areas. This should only be done with a full evaluation to understand its effectiveness and impacts.”
While the Government advisor recommended cutting the salary threshold for skilled migrants from £30,000 to £25,600 for those coming to the UK with a job offer, it ruled out introducing a specific lower pay threshold for Scotland or any other part of the UK, saying there should be a “single national salary threshold,” which would take a similar approach to the operation of the national minimum wage.
The Scottish Government welcomed the MAC’s proposal for rural pilots but expressed “extreme disappointment” that its report failed to respond to the serious concerns from across all sectors of the Scottish economy.
Ben Macpherson, the Scottish Government’s Migration Minister, said: “The committee recommendations offer little in the way of practical measures to help Scotland address acute issues of depopulation and skills gaps.
“Worryingly, it accepts the proposed changes will cut immigration, reducing the size of the UK population and total GDP.”
Noting how there was a need for a “fundamentally different approach” to immigration in Scotland given the nation’s distinct demographic and geographical needs, Mr Macpherson added: “Devolving immigration powers by introducing a Scottish Visa would allow Scotland to attract and retain people with the skills and attributes we need for our communities and economy to flourish. We urge the UK Government to engage seriously with our proposals, which have widespread support.”
Liz Cameron, Chief Executive of the Scottish Chambers of Commerce, said: “While the MAC’s plan for a reduction in the salary threshold is welcome and the list of eligible jobs has been expanded, it is disappointing that recommendations did not take account of regional salary differences. We believe this risks limiting access to skills for companies in Scotland.
“Employers in Scotland need a migration system that suits regional wage levels and is responsive to Scotland’s unique demographic challenges. Our members have consistently raised concerns that a one-size-fits-all approach across the UK will not meet business and economic needs,” she added.
On Monday, Nicola Sturgeon published her administration’s plan for a Scottish Visa to help the nation cope with an end to freedom of movement after Brexit.
The First Minister proposed the part-devolution of immigration to Holyrood to attract migrants through a cheaper, simpler visa based on Scottish residency and the Scottish tax code.
However, the Home Office dismissed the Scottish Visa idea, making clear immigration would “remain a reserved matter” and noting how different rules around the UK would “massively complicate” the system.
READ MORE: German politician calls on MEPs to sing 'Auld Lang Syne' after Brexit vote
Prof Alan Manning, the MAC Chairman, said: "No perfect system exists and there are unavoidable, difficult trade-offs.
"The largest impacts will be in low-wage sectors and the Government needs to be clear about its plans for lower-skilled work migration."
Overall, the report warned that replacing freedom of movement with a points-based system could cut economic growth and might only lead to small improvements in standards of living.
It suggested the Government's proposed overhaul of migration rules could have "zero effect" on providing more British jobs for British workers.
Christine Jardine for the Liberal Democrats said: "The Conservatives’ proposals to end free movement will make it harder for our schools and NHS to hire the teachers, nurses and doctors they need.
“As the MAC makes clear, these plans will make the crisis in social care even worse. They will also mean huge amounts of extra costs and bureaucracy for thousands of British businesses. No amount of spin will change that fact,” insisted the Edinburgh MP.
Downing Street said: "The Government will introduce a firmer and fairer points-based immigration system from 2021 that welcomes talent from around the world while reducing low-skilled migrants and bringing overall numbers down.
"We will carefully consider the report before setting out further details on the new system."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel