UNIONIST protesters have been ejected from the Holyrood chamber after barracking Nicola Sturgeon about alleged IRA supporters in the SNP.
One called the First Minister “Brigadier Sturgeon”.
Presiding Officer Ken Macintosh briefly halted proceedings as the two men were removed by staff and police during First Minister’s Questions.
One of the men also referred to John Mason, the SNP MSP for Glasgow Shettleston.
READ MORE: FMQs recap: Two men 'taken from debate chamber gallery after shouting about IRA'
In 2017, he was forced to apologise after suggesting some people saw the IRA terrorists who killed three soldiers in 1971 as “freedom fighters”.
Asked on Twitter to support a justice campaign for the three soldiers, he said: “You say Irish murderers. Others say Irish freedom fighters. I support Scottish soldiers if they do good but not if they do bad”.
Mr Mason was in the headlines again last week after saying he would not speak up for constituents who supported for Orange walks and the Union.
It also emerged his website asked constituents who contacted him what party they supported and if they backed independence.
The Scottish Tories have said Ms Sturgeon should consider ending his political career.
At First Minister’s Questions, Glasgow Maryhill MSP Bob Doris was about to ask a question when shouting was heard from one of the public galleries.
A man shouted at Ms Sturgeon: “Brigadier Sturgeon, why do so many of your party support the IRA? Do you think that’s appropriate? Supporting the IRA, the party of administration in government?
“John Mason, a sectarian bigot, won’t support unionists in society.”
When other people in the chamber reacted with baffled cries of “What?”, the man replied: “Yeah, laugh. Brigadier Sturgeon.
"How many support the IRA in your party, Nicola? John Mason called them Irish freedom fighters, did he, and he won’t support unionists. SNP IRA!”
The broadcast feed to the general public was cut during the incident.
However a full audio recording of the exchange, apparently made by one of the men involved, was later posted on social media.
It includes one man refusing to give his details to the police, arguing he has not committed an offence, but agreeing to leave the building while referring to “terrorists in government”.
Just in case anyone is wondering, this is the audio of Sturgeons and Mason being called out in Parliament. https://t.co/uYVbuVGDLb
— The Winter Wino (@WWWright_Way3) January 23, 2020
Mr Mason later left the chamber flanked by fellow SNP MSPs Christine Grahame and Roseanna Cunningham and refused to take questions from the media.
Mr Cunningham, the environment secretary, advised him: “Don’t engage”.
Mr Mason said he would respond later in a written statement.
FMQs was twice interrupted last week by climate change protestors.
Asked later about the incident, the First Minister’s official spokesman called it a “bizarre intervention” that he didn’t want to dignify with a longer answer.
Asked if Mr Mason was giving the SNP a bad name, he replied: “I’m not here to speak for John Mason. I’m here to speak for the Government.”
In a statement, Mr Mason said: "Firstly, I do not agree with people disrupting Parliament in the way that happened today.
"There are many ways for people to express their opinions to MSPs and other politicians.
"First Minister’s Questions is an important part of the democratic process and it should be allowed to take place uninterrupted. Otherwise democracy suffers.
"Therefore, I do not feel it is appropriate for me to comment today on anything the protestors may have said or meant.
"I can discuss these issues at another time but I do not want to give publicity to this kind of action which I fundamentally disagree with."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel