A HERITAGE watchdog has said around 700 people have signed up for a meeting over the future of public spaces in the Scottish capital like Princes Street Gardens.
The Cockburn Association is holding the gathering under the "City for Sale?" banner at the Central Hall in Tollcross tonight.
Campaigners called for a rethink in Edinburgh after the Princes Street Gardens were turned into a mudbath after the Christmas market.
More than 2.6 million people visited the controversial market, which was at East Princes Street Gardens for seven weeks.
READ MORE: Anger as gardens left a mudbath by Edinburgh's Christmas market
It is expected to take up to 14 weeks to have the area returned to public use.
Clear-up operation. Image: Gordon Terris
The Cockburn Association said: "One of the defining issues currently in front of the City of Edinburgh is how we value our public places.
"Should our parks and gardens be an oasis of green-ness and tranquillity, or should they be the city’s performance hubs, the go-to places for happening events and festival activities?
"There is no doubt that public concern that parks, gardens and other open spaces are increasingly turned over to an expanding event-based tourism sector.
"This year’s Christmas market in East Princes Street Gardens caused a storm of controversary when a huge space deck was erected by the city council’s contractors Underbelly without planning consent.
"It emerged yesterday that the reparation works will take 12-14 weeks before public use can be fully restored.
"This public summit will allow members of the public to raise issues and concerns in front of an expert panel."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel