ALTERNATIVES to Scottish independence are “slowly closing down”, a former Labour first minister of Scotland has said.
Henry McLeish said a second independence referendum cannot be repeatedly voted down “because you’re voting against democracy”.
He said his party needed to rethink its policies around independence and come up with an alternative, likely based around the idea of federalism, while it can.
Mr McLeish was Scotland’s second first minister from 2000 to 2001.
Speaking to the BBC’s Good Morning Scotland, he said: “People keep talking about an indyref2. What we need to be talking about is a referendum about the future of Scotland.
“There’s a wider issue, and the fact is that the polls really haven’t moved since 2014 in terms of independence.
“There is a window of opportunity. But the point is that Labour cannot be seen just to be sticking to old shibboleths, old ideas.
“This is 2020. We’re 120 years on from the party being created, and I think if we change our views in Scotland we will change the mood.
“And there is a Labour vote in Scotland that would want to vote Labour.”
His comments come after Scottish Labour’s governing body blocked plans to hold a special conference to thrash out its position on a second referendum.
Scottish leader Richard Leonard had wanted to hold the meeting in May. But in a blow to his authority, this was rejected by the Scottish Executive Committee.
READ MORE: Scottish Labour split on Indyref2 erupts into ‘chaotic’ public row
Despite this, Mr McLeish said Mr Leonard had “shown leadership” on the issue.
He said: “I think it’s important that you cannot keep voting against the idea of an indyref2 because you’re voting against democracy.
“What the Labour Party needs instead is an alternative. Can the Union be saved? Can Scots have a policy which they like which stops short of independence?
“The SNP have done fabulously well in promoting one idea. But Scotland has not [been] shown yet as enthusiastically embracing the whole question of independence.
“That’s Labour’s opportunity in Scotland, and Richard Leonard’s right to take it.”
He added: “I’ve been talking about federalism for a decade. I’ve been talking about an independent Scottish Labour Party for a decade.
“These are not new or brilliant ideas. But Labour has failed to gain any traction post-devolution in Scotland.
“We have a situation where the SNP are the voice of Scotland.
“Now, if Labour wants to emulate any of that, it’s got to quite rightly say, ‘Look, if the future of Scotland’s important, do Scots want independence, or is there an alternative?'
“But let’s be honest, the opportunity for alternatives is slowly closing down, and my fear is that if we don’t watch, the Labour Party will be part of a policy that helps us drift towards independence.”
READ MORE: Mark Smith: If you can’t beat ’em, join ’em. What I learned from my first independence march
He said “that might be a good idea at the end of the day”, but added: “That’s why Labour should embrace democracy, because if they want to put an alternative up to independence, which I think would be federalism, that would be fine. But if they don’t, that’s also fine.
“But at the end of the day, Labour has got to reconnect with the electorate in Scotland, reconnect with the idea of a different Scotland – whether it’s in the Union or out of the Union, and currently they’re not doing it. This is not rocket science. They should be doing this at the present time.”
SNP deputy leader Keith Brown said: "More and more senior Labour voices are starting to realise that denying Scotland’s right to choose our own future is a completely unsustainable position, and it’s clear the tide is turning.
“It’s time that Richard Leonard saw sense and stood with the vast majority of people in Scotland – rather than being driven by the Better Together mentality of siding with the Tories to block Scotland’s will at every turn.
“Labour supporters are increasingly coming to the view that the Westminster system of government is failing people in Scotland, and that no politician – Tory or Labour – has the right to deny Scotland’s democratic right to choose our own future.
“Only the SNP are offering a positive vision for the future of Scotland – we must be able to choose that future in an independence referendum.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel