The relationship between Holyrood and Westminster is at a “low ebb” and has deteriorated since Boris Johnson’s election victory, Scotland’s Constitutional Relations Secretary has said.
Mike Russell claimed the UK Government had shown devolved nations “scant – if any – respect” and predicted it will ignore the Scottish Parliament’s views on the Prime Minister’s Brexit deal.
READ MORE: Iain Macwhirter: Scotland won't be riding to Labour's rescue this time around
Under the devolution agreement, Westminster must seek legislative consent for issues affecting devolved policy areas but, in practice, the UK Government could still proceed against the will of the Scottish, Welsh or Northern Irish administrations.
Mike Russell has urged MSPs to reject the Brexit deal (Jane Barlow/PA)
With MSPs likely to withhold consent for Mr Johnson’s Withdrawal Agreement in a vote, Mr Russell told the Scottish Parliament’s Constitution Committee it was a “thoroughly bad Bill that prefaces a thoroughly bad Brexit”.
“The Bill is not one that the Scottish people should accept and it is therefore not one that the Scottish Parliament should accept,” he said.
Revealing the state of relations between the two Governments ahead of a Joint Ministerial Committee, Mr Russell said: “There has been scant, if any, respect for the devolved administrations, very little, if any, for the devolved competencies and a view that when push comes to shove the UK Government can do precisely what it wishes to do.”
He ascribed some of the blame to the “considerable nervousness within the UK’s civil service about what is taking place and how it’s taking place” and said: “It’s fair to say that normal relationships which I’ve been used to as a minister these last 12 years are at a low ebb from officials as well as ministers.
The Prime Minister’s Withdrawal Agreement would give Westminster powers over devolved areas but the Scottish Government said they only learned of the Bill’s details the day before its publication.
Addressing comments from the UK Government thanking Holyrood for its input to the Bill, Mr Russell said: “They say that they work with the devolved administrations as if everything was wonderful – it isn’t wonderful.
READ MORE: Alister Jack confirms he has received Nicola Sturgeon’s request for a second independence referendum
“It’s an extraordinarily difficult set of relations that have got even worse since the Johnson Government got elected.”
Mr Russell was asked by the SNP’s Angela Constance about problems for EU citizens in the UK who are “having to apply for rights they already have”.
Arguing there are practical problems with the settled status scheme as well as ethical concerns, Mr Russell said: “This isn’t a particularly well-run scheme and it’s producing results that are unacceptable for some people.
“But there’s the political and moral objection to people who have spent some of them their entire working lives in this country as citizens working alongside all of us and are now being told they will only have the right to stay if they go through this process which they find offensive.”
He also raised concerns about the Withdrawal Agreement’s apparent changes in Clause 26 that would mean courts are no longer bound by previous judgements by European Courts.
Citing the Scottish Government’s Fair Work agenda as being “based upon the rights and protections that exist in the European Union”, Mr Russell warned the UK Government wants to “cut and remove” workers’ rights.
He said: “The reality of the situation is this will undermine workers’ rights and protections, human rights will be undermined and environmental rights will be undermined.
“I don’t think there’s any doubt about it.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel