A SENIOR Tory MSP has called for a ban on anonymous social media accounts to help clean the “cesspit” of abuse faced by politicians online.
Murdo Fraser, who won the Herald’s E-Politician of the Year award in 2019 for deft use of social media, said anonymity was driving a daily torrent of “vile” posts.
Research into last month’s general election found candidates were subjected to four times the abuse seen in 2017, with around one in six messages directed at them insulting.
Analysis by PoliMonitor on behalf of the Joseph Rowntree Trust found 16.5 per cent of Twitter posts aimed at candidates were abusive, against 4% just two years earlier.
Most of the abuse - 96% - was directed at 150 candidates, with a select handful attracting hundreds of angry messages each day.
The most attacked person online was Boris Johnson, followed by Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn and the then LibDem leader Jo Swinson.
Female candidates received slightly more abuse than male ones.
Online abuse has been cited as a significant factor in MPs standing down at the election, and a reluctance on the part of women in particular to enter politics.
Last year the prominent SNP MP Joanna Cherry QC revealed she had received a police escort to her constituency surgery after a “credible death threat” against her.
Kirstene Hair, the then Tory MP for Angus, also told the BBC she would go “insane” if she didn’t ignore the abuse she received, yet knew threats had to be taken seriously.
Writing in the Scotsman, Mr Fraser said there was a clear role for social media companies such as Twitter and Facebook in helping to curb attacks.
“It is simply too easy for any individual to set up an anonymous Twitter account and then use it to bombard those of a different political persuasion with abusive messages.
“Whilst tweets can be reported for inappropriate language, in my experience the bar is set very high in terms of what is viewed as permissible, and in any event, this is only addressing the problem after it has occurred.
“It is the anonymity of social media that makes abuse so prevalent.
“If individuals were required to identify themselves, they might be much less prepared to send vitriol to complete strangers who just happen to take a different political view.
“If they knew that family members, friends and work colleagues could see what they were posting, they might just pause and think before pressing Send on a torrent of vile abuse.”
He acknowledged ending anonymity in social media would require a change of policy by the media leviathans involved, but said it was a step “that needs to be taken”.
People had to change too.
“We cannot just blame the social media companies for a negative aspect of human character. This is an area where each and every one of us has to take personal responsibility.”
He said binary views on Brexit and Scottish independence had “undoubtedly contributed to the toxicity of the political debate”, and hoped the absence of a scheduled election in 2020 would make the atmosphere “a little less febrile”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel