Boris Johnson has described the idea of a bridge connecting Scotland and Northern Ireland as “very interesting,” after reportedly seeking out cost estimates for the project.
The Prime Minister was responding to a question in the House of Commons over a ‘Boris Bridge” across the Irish Sea - three months after asking Treasury officials to prepare a report on the potential benefits and risks of the plan.
Mr Johnson previously claimed such a project would cost around £15 billion to complete and once floated the idea during his time as foreign secretary.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson seeks cost estimates for a Scotland-Northern Ireland bridge
However, the report, leaked to Channel 4 in September, said it was not without danger, citing particular concern around the presence of WW2 munitions in the Irish Sea.
A road connection between the two countries has been championed by the DUP, who said it would encourage economic growth and recognise "the strong economic, cultural and social links between the two regions".
In was first put forward in the party's 2015 election manifesto, but has grown in potential significance since the 2016 Brexit vote.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon demands permanent referendum power for Holyrood
Speaking in the Commons on Thursday, Mr Johnson answered a question from Northern Irish MP Ian Paisley Jr, who asked if Johnson would consider “building a Boris bridge, not just a Boris bus.”
The Prime Minister responded: “As for the desire for a bridge to connect the two biggest isles in the British isles, all I can say is that it is a very interesting idea.”
“I advise him to watch this space and indeed, watch that space between those islands because what he has said has not fallen on deaf ears.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel