THE Scottish Conservatives have put Nicola Sturgeon at the heart of their final election drive in the belief her personal unpopularity will sway tactical voters.
The Tories today unveiled a new poster using a picture of the First Minister and the slogan: “She’s had her say, now have yours.. This Thursday stop Indyref2”.
The party’s press statement tellingly failed to mention Boris Johnson or Brexit given the unpopularity of them both north of the border.
Instead, Scottish leader Jackson Carlaw urged Unionist campaigners to “come together” in marginal seats and lend the Tories their vote.
It coincides with the First Minister saying she would still want to hold Indyref2 next year even if there was a Remain vote in a second Brexit referendum first.
Ms Sturgeon has said that if there is another hung parliament she would want both votes next year in return for supporting Jeremy Corbyn as Prime Minister.
On BBC Radio Scotland, Ms Sturgeon accepted that a Brexit referendum would come first in such a scenario, as Labour has promised one within six months, whereas she has said she wants Indyref2 within 12 months.
She said: “It looks as if the EU one would come first and then an independence referendum towards the end of next year. That's the sequencing.
"In terms of the priority, in order of importance if you like, I want the whole UK to get the opportunity to escape Brexit, but of course an EU referendum doesn't guarantee that Scotland escapes Brexit, we could have the same result we had in 2016.
“This election won't decide independence, but it does help to determine whether Boris Johnson decides our future or the people of Scotland do so."
The SNP’s Holyrood manifesto for 2016 said there should be another independence vote if there was “a significant and material change in the circumstances that prevailed in 2014”, when Scotland 55-45 to stay in the UK.
As an example, it added: “such as Scotland being taken out of the EU against our will”.
Asked if a Remain vote in a second EU referendum would get rid of that significant and material change, Ms Sturgeon said: “No. My manifesto in 2016 said a material change of circumstances such as, for example, Brexit.”
Pressed about that material change disappearing, she said: “No. I don't accept that.
“Because the material change is, yes, the prospect of Scotland being taken out of the EU, but also the contemptuous way which Scotland has been treated with our interests, our voice, our views, completely ignored."
When it was put to her she had been saying Westminster treats Scotland contemptuously for decades, she said: “Indeed. But I think we’ve seen that in spades over the past three years. I’m being very clear in this election. I think it’s right for Scotland to have a choice over its own future.”
Unveiling his party’s new poster on an Advan in Tory-held East Renfrewshire, Mr Carlaw said: “Nicola Sturgeon has had her say during this election campaign.
“She’s said she’d prop up Jeremy Corbyn in Number Ten, despite his unsuitability for the job. She’s made clear she’ll demand a second independence referendum as early as Friday.
“She has said she wants to hold that referendum next year, dragging us back to yet more division.
“She has had her say, on Thursday we can have ours.”
“We can say no to a second independence referendum, we can say no to more division, and we can make Nicola Sturgeon listen for once.”
“In 2017, people came together and backed the Scottish Conservatives. It hit the SNP hard and, as a result, we forced Nicola Sturgeon to put Indyref2 on hold. We need to tell her again and halt the Nationalists in their tracks.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel