AS polls show the Conservative Party has seen its lead in public opinion lose its bounce, the potential of a hung parliament increases the risk of the UK either crashing out of the European Union or facing a return to the “Brexit impasse horror show” of recent years, a polling expert has warned.
Professor Sir John Curtice, speaking at a hustings event hosted by The Herald in Glasgow, said the Tories’ lead in the poll had fallen back to 10 per cent – about the same level as it was when the election was first called.
But he said if their lead were to narrow further – say by six points – the probability of Boris Johnson winning a majority would be 50% compared to 50% for a hung parliament, he said.
“Because the Conservatives no longer have friends left in the House of Commons, if they don’t get a majority they will soon be in trouble,” he said.
READ MORE: Poll: SNP on course for extra 11 MPs at General Election
He outlined the case if opposition parties failed to achieve the votes to get the Tory government out – but Boris didn’t have the votes to get the withdrawal treaty through parliament. This would be a “narrow” range of 320-326 seats being won by the Tories.
“What happens in that situation, your guess is as good as mine,” he said.” Strictly speaking, we could just be heading for crashing out without a deal.”
Some Tory MPs who would back Boris’s deal with the European Union would, however, resist a sudden departure, he said, which would mean a return to the difficulties of parliamentarians having to decide how to handle Brexit.
“There’s that very narrow range of results which welcome back the Brexit impasse horror show,” he said.
Nevertheless, the SNP and the Liberal Democrats would be duty-bound to shore up a minority Labour government because they supported the General Election in hopes of achieving a second referendum, even if arguments remain over issues such as Trident and the unpopularity of Jeremy Corbyn as leader.
READ MORE: Tory high command says public fed up with TV interviews being 'all about interviewer'
He said: “The realpolitik of the situation here is if there is a majority of MPs from elected parties that are in favour of a second referendum then, although there are various noises about Trident and ‘we don’t like Jeremy Corbyn’, it would happen.
“Given the LibDems and SNP precipitated this election in order to precipitate a second referendum, it has to be the case that if there is a chance of sustaining a minority Labour administration in order to apply for an extension to article 50 and then put the issue to the electorate, they would”
But the Labour coalition would not last longer than a year, he predicted.
“My expectation would be if we were to have a deeply minority Labour administration put in for the purposes of having a second referendum, probably the three opposition parties could agree on a budget because they are on roughly the same page on spending and taxation.
"But I would think it would be unlikely that the government would survive roughly beyond this time next year. Because once Brexit is sorted one way or another the purpose of that government will have disappeared.
"We will all be back to the hustings again.”
On the outcome of a second referendum on Brexit, Mr Curtice said polls have been remarkably consistent with 52% in favour of overturning Brexit to remain and 48% still voting leave.
He added: “What that points to is that the ability of the remain side to mobilise that vote would be crucial, and there is no guarantee they would succeed in doing so.”
Professor Curtice was addressing an audience a hustings event arranged by the Association of Independent Professionals and the Self-Employed (IPSE) at the Radisson Blu hotel in Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel