Emmanuel Macron has stood his ground and insisted Nato seems to be suffering from “brain death” as national leaders gathered for a summit marking the 70th anniversary of the western alliance.
The French President’s remarks were criticised by Donald Trump as “very insulting" to Nato allies.
Sitting alongside Jens Stoltenberg, the alliance’s Secretary General, the US President described Mr Macron’s outburst as a “very nasty statement”.
Noting how France had had a “very rough year” with high unemployment and the yellow vests’ protests, Mr Trump said nonetheless “you just can't go around making statements like that about Nato; it is very disrespectful".
- READ MORE: Donald Trump - US wouldn't want NHS
Mr Stoltenberg also defended the alliance, saying: "Nato is active, Nato is agile, Nato is adapting. We have just implemented the largest reinforcement of collective defence since the Cold War."
Mr Macron's criticism followed Turkey's incursion against the Kurds in northern Syria, which alarmed other Nato members because there was no forewarning.
Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the Turkish President, forcefully dismissed Mr Macron's comments, accusing him of "a sick and shallow understanding" of terrorism and suggesting that he was the one who was "brain dead".
Yet, the French President’s concern is shared across many European capitals at the Turkish offensive last October against the Kurds; seen as crucial allies of the West in the fight against Islamic State.
The incursion - which went ahead after Mr Erdogan was effectively given the green light by Mr Trump - was widely regarded as strengthening the position of Russia in Syria while triggering another humanitarian crisis.
There was further alarm among alliance members when Mr Erdogan chose to purchase Russian air defence systems; regarded as a further weakening of his country’s commitment to Nato.
Boris Johnson, who attended a meeting in Downing St with Mr Macron, President Erdogan and Germany’s Angela Merkel to discuss the situation in Syria, is trying to hold the atmosphere together ahead of the formal Nato gathering at a country house hotel in Watford on Wednesday.
Despite allies’ criticism of his outspoken remarks, Mr Macron emerged from a meeting at the US ambassador's residence, to insist there was a need within the alliance for a "strategic clarification" on how to deliver long-term peace in Europe.
He and Mr Trump struck a conciliatory note following their bilateral, both acknowledging Nato needed to look beyond the threat from Russia to issues such as Islamic terrorism.
"The President and I feel that we need more flexibility so we can use it for other things, not just one specific country," explained Mr Trump.
"A lot of people say Nato was originally meant to look at the Soviet Union, now Russia, but we also have other things to look at, whether it is radical Islamic terrorism, whether it is the tremendous growth of China."
Mr Macron acknowledged that there had been US "over-investment" in the alliance for decades; a key complaint of Mr Trump that other Nato members were not paying their way.
As Nato leaders prepared for two receptions, one at Buckingham Palace, and the other in No 10, Downing St sought to instil a sense of unity within the alliance, which it said was the “most enduring and successful in military history” and that Mr Johnson believed it needed to continue to adapt to the evolving threats that it faced.
"It is the cornerstone of Euro-Atlantic security and it helps to keep a billion people safe,” declared a spokesman. "The PM will emphasise that all members must be united behind shared priorities, so Nato can adapt to the challenges ahead," he added.
Wednesday’s meeting is expected to consider new threats, including in the areas of cyber and space, after the alliance last month declared space was one of its operational domains alongside air, land, sea and cyber.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel