The UK's nuclear weapons are important to Nato, its Secretary General has said, in response to the Scottish Government's desire to scrap the "deterrent".
With the SNP opposing nuclear weapons and calling for the removal of the Trident missile system from Scotland, Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg argued that the world would not be safer if Nato members got rid of their nuclear arsenals.
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said she would never use nuclear weapons and has called for the "immoral" Trident nuclear system - based on the Clyde - to be scrapped.
Asked on The Andrew Marr Show whether Britain would still be a valued member of Nato without nuclear weapons, Mr Stoltenberg said: "Britain is a highly valued member of Nato for many reasons.
"You spend more than 2% on defence, you provide a lot of valuable, high-end capabilities and you have shown again and again you are willing to deploy when needed.
"Part of the UK contribution to Nato is of course the UK nuclear weapons - the nuclear deterrent - which contributes to the overall nuclear deterrent of Nato, which is something that is important for Nato."
Mr Stoltenberg, who was formerly the Norwegian prime minister, added: "Nato's goal is a world without nuclear weapons but we have to arrive there through viable, balanced nuclear arms control and disarmament.
READ MORE: Donald Trump invited back to Buckingham Palace for Nato reception
"The world will not be safer if Nato got rid of all its nuclear weapons while countries like Russia, China, North Korea and other countries maintain their nuclear weapons.
"So yes, we would like to see a world without nuclear weapons but as long as there are nuclear weapons, Nato will remain a nuclear alliance."
Ms Sturgeon, asked during the General Election campaign about her stance on the issue, said: "I think nuclear weapons are immoral, I think they're ineffective and I think they're a waste of money.
"I would not countenance their use and I look forward to the day where not just Scotland is free of nuclear weapons, but the world is free of nuclear weapons."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel