Conventional fillings may not be the best way of tackling decay in children’s teeth, new research suggests.
The three-year study found no evidence to suggest that fillings are more effective than sealing decay into teeth, or using prevention techniques alone, in stopping pain and infection from tooth decay in primary teeth, also known as milk teeth.
The FiCTION study also found that 450 children who took part in the research experienced tooth decay and pain regardless of which kind of dental treatment they received.
READ MORE: Islanders facing 70-mile round trip to see dentist
Researchers said that the best approach is to prevent tooth decay from occurring in the first place.
Professor Nicola Innes, chairwoman of paediatric dentistry at the University of Dundee and lead author on the paper, said: “Our study shows that each way of treating decay worked to a similar level but that children who get tooth decay at a young age have a high chance of experiencing toothache and abscesses regardless of the way the dentist manages the decay.
“What is absolutely clear from our trial is that the best way to manage tooth decay is not by drilling it out or sealing it in – it’s by preventing it in the first place.”
During the study, more than 1,140 children between the ages of three and seven with visible tooth decay were recruited by dentists working in one of 72 dental clinics throughout the country.
One of three treatment approaches was then chosen randomly for each child’s dental care for the duration of the trial, which was up to three years.
READ MORE: 'Worrying' decline in Scottish students as Glasgow Dental School
The first approach avoided placing any fillings and aimed to prevent new decay by reducing sugar intake, ensuring twice daily brushing with fluoridated toothpaste, application of fluoride varnish and placing of fissure sealants on the first permanent molar (back) teeth.
The second option involved drilling out tooth decay, an option based on what has been considered the standard “drill and fill” practice for more than 50 years, together with preventive treatments.
The third treatment strategy was a minimally invasive approach where tooth decay was sealed in under a metal crown or a filling to stop it progressing together with preventive treatments.
The main trial findings, published in the Journal of Dental Research, found no evidence to suggest that any of the treatment strategies were better than another in terms of making a difference in children’s experience of pain or infection, quality of life or dental anxiety between groups.
READ MORE: Warning 'double standard' in Scotland's new dental inspections leaving NHS patients in the dark
All three different ways of treating decay were found to be acceptable to children, parents and dental professionals.
Scotland’s Chief Dental Officer Tom Ferris said: “FiCTION highlights the importance of preventing tooth decay in our youngest children.
“I believe the key to success in prevention lies within families and communities; for this reason the Scottish Government launched the Oral Health Community Challenge Fund for third sector organisations working alongside families living in our most disadvantaged areas.
“The activities from these projects complement our mainstream Childsmile work in education and health settings.”
The study was led by dentists from the universities of Dundee, Newcastle, Sheffield, Cardiff, Queen Mary University of London and Leeds.
It was funded by the Health Technology Assessment programme of the National Institute for Health Research.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here