The BBC is facing criticism following their Question Time Leaders' Debate amid claims they edited out laughter directed at the Prime Minister.
Boris Johnson took to the stage with leaders of Westminster's other largest parties; Jeremy Corbyn, Jo Swinson and Nicola Sturgeon.
They were each given 30 minutes to take questions from the live audience in Sheffield, but the reaction to one question has left BBC producers under fire.
The first audience member to question the Prime Minister said: "I’d just like to ask you how important is it for someone in your position of power to always tell the truth?"
READ MORE: Question Time audience bursts into laughter over panellists' Boris Johnson comment
In footage broadcast on the Friday night show, the audience can be heard laughing during the applause at the tail end of the question.
This is utterly extraordinary. @BBCNews has edited out the audience laughing at Boris Johnson being questioned on trust.
— Aaron Bastani (@AaronBastani) November 23, 2019
The first part is from last night’s debate, the second is from BBC News at 1pm today. #ge2019 pic.twitter.com/PjhAQsWLoH
However, eagle-eyed Twitter users noticed a distinct difference in the footage shown on Saturday's News at One.
The question is played in full once more, however, the laughter is hardly audible against the applause.
It has sparked a fresh bias accusation from users on social media, with one saying the difference is 'utterly extraordinary'.
BBC responded to one of the accusatory tweets and said the clip was deliberately shortened for timing reasons.
They wrote: "This clip, which was played in full on the 10 o’clock news last night, was shortened for timing reasons in today’s lunchtime bulletin.
"We’ve fully covered Boris Johnson’s appearance on the BBC QT special, and the reaction to it, across our outlets."
Many users were quick to comment on the statement issued by the press office.
One wrote: "This is utter nonsense, by “shortening” it you fundamentally change its context and impact."
Another said: "'Shortened for timing reasons' - you literally took 1/2 a second out of it, which just happened to be the 1/2 a second the audience were laughing at Boris Johnson."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel