JO Swinson has defended her willingness to order a nuclear strike, but said her aim remains multilateral disarmament.
The Liberal Democrat leader was criticised earlier this week after saying she was ready to use the UK’s nuclear deterrent if she achieved her election goal of becoming Prime Minister.
Asked if she would ever be prepared to use a nuclear weapon, she replied simply: “Yes.”
Nicola Sturgeon called it “sickening to hear this question asked and answered, as if it’s some kind of virility test, without any context”.
The First Minister also said she would never use an “immoral” weapon to kill millions.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon slams Jo Swinson for 'disgraceful response' to nuclear weapons question
On a campaign visit to Glasgow, Ms Swinson was asked about her comment.
She said: “Liberal Democrats support a nuclear deterrent, but we support multilateral disarmament.
“The best use for nuclear weapons is to use them to negotiate away other nuclear weapons.
“I want to see a world where these types of weapons dn’t exist, and the way to do that is to work with other countries through those international mechanisms to be able to reduce the amount of nuclear weapons that exist, and I’m very committed to the UK’s role in that procesand in maintaining a deterrent in a very uncertain world while that happens.”
Pressed on whether she had meant she was ready to deploy nuclear weapons in a state of war, she said: “I answered the questioned. I answered the question honestly. I answered it clearly. I think that it’s important that if a deterrent is to be effective then that is the situation.
READ MORE: Mark Smith: Jo Swinson had to say yes to the nuclear button question
“Of course we want to make sure that our world is safer and we can reduce and get rid of nuclear weapons, but the way to do that is through diplomacy, is through a multilateral approach working with other countries.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel