SCOTRAIL faced a backlash last night over responses by the firm’s Twitter account to social media users.
In a series of replies, one of the staff operating the account – named “MF” – issued snappy answers to those with questions.
Referring to a campaign to ensure tickets are bought before boarding, Gordon Stewart asked: “What if you catch the train with seconds to spare? Are we getting the jail even though buying a ticket on the train going to a barrier station?”
ScotRail replied: “We would advise to arrive at the station with plenty of time before hand. Thanks, ^MF”
Is it a major issue buying from the ticket machine or booking offices before getting on the train, Fraser? ^CT
— ScotRail (@ScotRail) November 18, 2019
Scott Mackenzie weighed in, telling ScotRail: “This is an awful response. Some people need to catch a bus to the station which they have no control over and can mean getting there two minutes before train is due.”
Another user, Paul Moran, posted a picture of a folded-up seat and asked: “Why offer first-class tickets for trains that only have two carriages and no seats. Having to sit on one of these as well. Edinburgh to Perth.”
ScotRail hit back: “That is a seat, Paul. ^MF”
I'm not going to discuss "what if's" with you, Josh. If your station has ticket facilities then we would recommend to buy before you board, if you're unable to buy one then discuss this with the conductor. ^MF
— ScotRail (@ScotRail) November 18, 2019
Moran replied: “That’s not the point nor funny. I’m a visitor to your country and went to buy a ticket. £16 single or £23 first class. Decided to treat myself.
"Train has no first-class section or seats. So basically ripped off £7. Why sell 1st class tickets for a train that has none.”
Only then did ScotRail offer advice on refunds.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here