Around 150 asylum seekers denied the right to remain in the UK are facing eviction after losing a legal challenge over lock-changes.
The case against Home Office contractor Serco’s lock-change programme in Glasgow had argued eviction would be unlawful without a court order.
A judge dismissed the case in April but asylum seekers appealed against that decision at the Court of Session, Scotland’s highest civil court.
READ MORE: Hundreds face asylum evictions in Scotland as Serco starts lock-changing programme
But in a ruling on Wednesday, the court backed the previous decision and said evictions without court orders are not unlawful.
Serco is still housing around 150 people whose application for asylum was turned down, and they are now facing eviction.
Mike Dailly of Govan Law Centre, which represents Shakar Ali, in whose name the case was brought, said she is now considering an appeal to the UK Supreme Court.
Charities have criticised the Court of Session decision.
Robina Qureshi, director of Positive Action in Housing, said: “What this decision has done is to legally institute a form of housing apartheid in the city where one section of our community have their human and housing rights upheld.
“And another very vulnerable community can be dragged from their homes at any time and turfed out on to the streets without recourse to work, support or a roof over their heads.”
Sabir Zazai, chief executive of Scottish Refugee Council, said: “This galling verdict leaves hundreds of men and women in Glasgow at risk of lock-change evictions and immediate street homelessness.”
Among those affected are Khadija Anwar, from Kenya, and her husband Muhammad Anwar, from Pakistan.
The couple, who are aged in their 70s, have been seeking asylum for eight years.
Mrs Anwar said: “How can they just lock our door and think that we are going to stay out on the road in this cold?
“It’s so stressful. What are they going to do with us? I hope they are not just going to throw us out.”
In the Court of Session ruling, Lady Dorrian said Ms Ali’s occupation of her property was “precarious” as it was temporary and she did not pay rent.
Lady Dorrian wrote: “The agreement under which she occupied the property made clear that her occupancy was temporary only, for the limited duration of the period during which her asylum claim was being assessed.”
Once the application was turned down she said Ms Ali need only be given written notice to leave the property and the process “does not require court procedure”.
Serco said it would work with the authorities and the sheriff court in Glasgow to ensure an “orderly sensitive application of the law”, and it would not seek to remove more than 20 people in any one week from their properties.
READ MORE: Serco loses asylum accommodation contract for Scotland
Julia Rogers, of Serco, said: “We have listened to the public concerns that the process to take back the properties they were living in might be unfair or illegal, but we now have clear judgments from Scotland’s highest court that our approach is completely proper and within the law.
“During this time Serco has been demonised and subject to extreme criticism, and the fact that we have spent millions of pounds supporting people who no longer have a right to remain in the UK and providing them with free accommodation has been widely ignored.”
New contract provider Mears, which took over from Serco, has agreed to improve the support for asylum seekers, help prevent destitution and replace lock-change evictions with a proper court process.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel