The SNP holding the balance of power in a hung parliament after December’s general election would be the “best” outcome for Scotland, Nicola Sturgeon has said.
The First Minister said such a scenario would put “Scotland into a powerful, influential position” where the country’s wishes could not be ignored by Westminster politicians.
She made the comments at an election rally, where she also revealed to party activists she had spent had spent “a fair bit of time” considering her next steps if the UK’s next prime minister refuses to grant her the power to hold a second Scottish independence referendum.
READ MORE: Sturgeon accuses Corbyn of failing to deal with anti-Semitism as he heads to Scotland
Boris Johnson has already ruled out granting a section 30 order, which would be necessary for the Scottish Government to hold a legally-binding ballot, if he is returned to Downing Street.
She refused to rule out a legal challenge, saying: “If we are in that situation, all options will be considered.”
The First Minister, speaking at an SNP election rally in Johnstone, Renfrewshire, was tight-lipped about her plans, saying: “We’re in an election campaign and if we reach that point, if we get to that bridge, I will set out then how I intend to cross that bridge.”
She added: “I think you can take for granted that I have spent a fair amount of time thinking about this over the past wee while.
“But I am not going to concede that point right now, I’m certainly not going to concede that point at the early stage of an election campaign, because as soon as you concede that point, you kind of concede the right of Westminster to have a veto over Scotland’s future.”
Looking ahead to the December 12 election, she said that “given the need to make Scotland’s voice heard … the need to make sure Scotland’s interests are to the fore, perhaps the best way of doing that is to have the SNP and SNP MPs holding the balance of power in a situation where neither of the main parties have an overall majority”.
Great to support the brilliant @MhairiBlack at a packed Town Hall meeting in Johnstone tonight. https://t.co/x89PTn4XYd
— Nicola Sturgeon (@NicolaSturgeon) November 12, 2019
Ms Sturgeon added this would put “Scotland into a powerful, influential position where we can make sure Scotland cannot be ignored”.
She insisted the “hard electoral reality” was that her SNP is the “main challenger” to Boris Johnson’s party in the 13 seats the Conservatives hold in Scotland.
In 2017, the 13 Scottish Conservative MPs were crucial in keeping the then prime minister Theresa May in Downing Street.
Ms Sturgeon told voters she believed the “best way” to deprive the current PM of a majority was to support her party.
The First Minister stated: “Fundamentally the question here is who decides Scotland’s future – is it Westminster, whether that is Boris Johnson or Jeremy Corbyn?
📢 @MhairiBlack: "If you believe in the NHS, if you believe in having an education system that works for everybody, if you believe we're only as strong as our weakest link, if you believe in a compassionate society, the only option is to #VoteSNP".
— The SNP (@theSNP) November 12, 2019
“Do we leave Scotland in the position in general elections of having to cross our fingers and hope for the least worst alternative to emerge at the end of that process, or do we take our future into our own hands so we can guarantee we always get the governments we vote for, whoever they happen to be?”
READ MORE: Iain Macwhirter: These grubby electoral pacts are all about vote-rigging
She described the election as a “really good opportunity for people in Scotland in the largest possible numbers to send a message to Boris Johnson” as she insisted that any continued refusal to allow a second independence vote was “not a sustainable position”.
Ms Sturgeon said: “Scotland can not and will not be ignored. Westminster does not have a veto on Scotland’s future, Scotland’s future is for the people of Scotland to decide.”
She went on to say there was “not a shadow of doubt” in her mind that Scots will vote for independence the next time the question is put to them.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel