A non-invasive urine test could be used by women to detect their risk of developing cervical cancer without needing to visit the doctor.
Researchers have developed a way to identify pre-cancer lesions by analysing urine and vaginal samples that could be collected by women in the comfort of their own home.
The “self-sampling” test proved popular with women taking part in the study, meaning it is likely to improve participation in cervical screening programmes if made widely available, they believe.
Dr Belinda Nedjai, director of the Molecular Epidemiology Lab at Queen Mary University of London, said: “The initial use of self-sampling is likely to be for women who do not attend clinic after a screening invitation and countries without a cervical cancer screening programme.
“In the longer term, self-sampling could become the standard method for all screening tests.
“The study indicated that women much preferred doing a test at home than attending a doctor’s surgery.”
READ MORE: Analysis: NHS too important not to be a political football
She added: “We expect the self-sampling test to improve acceptance rates for cervical cancer screening, as well as reducing costs to health services and improving the performance of screening programmes.”
Dr Nedjai told the 2019 NCRI Cancer Conference in Glasgow that the study was the largest to test for the S5 methylation classifier, a chemical change to one of the four DNA base letters that make up the human genetic code.
The test looks at the methylation of four HPV (human papillomavirus) types most strongly associated with cancer and a human gene to calculate a risk score.
It is estimated that if everyone attended screening regularly, 83% of cervical cancer cases could be prevented. If you're nervous, breathing exercises can help and nurses are trained to make you as comfortable as possible. #CervicalScreeningSavesLives #SexualHealthAwarenessWeek pic.twitter.com/43c4VWwfXm
— Public Health England (@PHE_uk) September 22, 2019
In earlier research, they found that the test, when performed on cervical samples taken by healthcare professionals, was 100% accurate at detecting invasive cervical cancer, and 93% accurate at detecting pre-cancer in women who had an HPV positive test.
In the new study, 620 women with abnormal smear tests or positive HPV results were asked to provide vaginal samples collected themselves using swabs.
The researchers extracted and analysed the DNA in the lab and generated S5 scores.
In urine samples, the S5 test was better at correctly identifying women who did have pre-cancer lesions than existing HPV tests.
READ MORE: Chief of Royal College of Surgeons Edinburgh Alison Rooney forced out in no confidence vote
The S5 test correctly identified high-risk pre-cancerous cells in 96% of samples compared with 73% with an HPV-16 or 18 test.
They believe it could be used in two ways – as a secondary test on HPV-positive women, or as a standalone test, where it correctly identified 85% of samples that were pre-cancerous.
Dr Nedjai added: “We are currently working on new markers to try to improve the accuracy of the classifier even further, but these findings represent an advance in cervical cancer screening, especially for women who do not attend the clinic, such as older women, or women who find the smear test too painful or who do not have access to a screening programme in their country. We think it’s promising.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here