BBC journalist Carrie Gracie has said there could be around 12 people at the corporation launching employment tribunals over claims of unequal pay.
It comes as presenter Samira Ahmed faces the BBC in court, where she will question why she was paid less than a male colleague for what she says is a “very similar job”.
The Radio 4 presenter is taking the corporation to an employment tribunal this week regarding alleged “failure to provide equal pay for equal value work”, according to court documents.
Ms Ahmed is asking why she was paid £465 per episode of Newswatch while Jeremy Vine, the National Union of Journalists (NUJ) said, was paid up to £3,000 for each episode of Points Of View - work Ms Ahmed described as comparable.
The BBC disagrees and its legal team will argue that the two presenters were not doing similar work.
READ MORE: BBC lambasted by Ofcom over coverage for Scottish audiences
Former China editor Gracie resigned from her position in January 2018 in protest at pay inequalities at the broadcaster, becoming a figurehead for other women after she made the announcement in an open letter.
Speaking to reporters at the tribunal, Gracie called those taking action “extremely brave and determined”, more than a year after she was back-paid the same as the North America editor, whose job she said was comparable to hers at the time.
She claimed management at the BBC was “defensive and resistant to admitting mistakes”, and said Ms Ahmed’s case was “emblematic and extremely important to all the other women still fighting”.
“I’m aware of about a dozen cases that are in the pipeline towards a tribunal now,” she said.
“It’s a slow pipe, but they are making their way towards tribunal.
“They’ve come out the end of the internal process and they are not prepared to give up at that point.
“These are extremely brave and determined people.”
She added: “None of us want this to be a stick with which to beat the BBC.
“We want to draw attention by means of an important story happening inside the BBC, to draw attention to a problem which is widespread in our society.”
Gracie, among a large group supporting Ms Ahmed at the tribunal, said there was a “very high degree of solidarity” among employees at the corporation, adding: “We will not be divided and ruled.”
Ms Ahmed arrived at the Central London Employment Tribunal building with a group of supporters, including fellow BBC presenter Naga Munchetty and members of the NUJ, which is backing the case.
The group cheered for her as she walked inside.
READ MORE: Viewers dissatisfied with impartiality of BBC and "coverage of extreme views” - Ofcom
The entirety of the tribunal’s first day took place in private while the two sides discussed legal arguments.
In a statement on Sunday evening, Ms Ahmed said: “I love my job on Newswatch despite it being difficult and challenging.
“On the back of my BBC ID card are written the BBC values which include ‘we respect each other and celebrate our diversity’ and ‘we take pride in delivering quality and value for money’.
“I just ask why the BBC thinks I am worth only a sixth of the value of the work of a man for doing a very similar job.”
Vine fronted long-running factual programme Points Of View until last year.
It has since dropped its presenter-led format and the 15-minute show is now narrated by Tina Daheley.
Newswatch is a 10-minute programme and audience-led critique of coverage by BBC One which airs on a Friday and Saturday.
Viewing figures released by the NUJ suggest that the audience for Newswatch is between 1.5 million and 1.9 million, while Points Of View has some 800,000 viewers.
READ MORE: SNP accuse BBC of 'selective storytelling' over political representation
In a statement, a BBC spokesman said: “The BBC is committed to equal pay. Points Of View is an entertainment programme with a long history and is a household name with the public.
“Newswatch - while an important programme - isn’t.
“Samira was paid the same as her male predecessor when she began presenting Newswatch.
“Gender has not been a factor in levels of pay for Points Of View.
“News and entertainment are very different markets and pay across the media industry reflects this.”
The tribunal is expected to last until next Tuesday, with the first witnesses due to be called tomorrow
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here