ENGLISH voters in Scotland are assumed to oppose independence. This may well be true of a majority, but I suspect many English-raised Brits who have chosen to make Scotland their home – or who like me have made their way here by some lucky accident – sympathise decidedly with the Yes camp.
From the discussions I’ve had with colleagues since arriving in Glasgow a few weeks ago to work at The Herald, I can’t help but feel that the visions for Scotland’s future – if it is to have one inside the UK – are all a hopeless fantasy. For many undecided Scottish voters this sort of alternative appears to appeal – it avoids the big leap while still rejecting arrangements as they are today.
But federalisation or any form of a significantly re-imagined UK is never going to happen. My experiences as an undergraduate at Oxford taught me at least that much. The English elite simply have no interest in a radical reform. While the discourse along this theme rages on north of the Border, the silence in the south-east of England roars a definitive “no”. Sweeping reform simply isn’t on the radar. And if it weren’t after a heartfelt vow to change was made on the eve of the 2014 poll and 45% still voted Yes, it is never going to be.
READ MORE: Lobby row Ruth Davidson set up her own consultancy firm 11 days ago
Because in a “precious union of nations”, as the nauseatingly insincere phrase goes, we would have said that given two nations rejected Brexit and the overall result in that referendum was narrow, we should leave but in a very soft form. A Union that respects the views of all its nations would allow for flexible arrangements where Scotland could have a deal tailored to its needs and respecting its anti-Brexit vote. But no such recognition of national differences within the UK came Scotland’s way. On Wednesday we even heard from the Prime Minister that the devolved legislatures have no role whatsoever in consenting to the Brexit deal – a claim as outrageous as it is erroneous.
For most of the southern English who go on to rule the UK roost, Scotland piques interest only for carefully selected performative acts. At Oxford the usual crowd of boys schooled in England with refined English accents and London homes would don their kilts for formal dinners and balls. Burns Night is one such favoured occasion of the Scottish-when-it-suits-me cohort. And then there’s the annual English middle-class pilgrimage to Edinburgh for the Fringe.
Scotland deserves better than the disregard the English demonstrate the rest of the year.
As much as our Westminster leaders profess their deep love of the Union, it feels much more like a love of the cultural prestige Scotland affords England and a fear of the symbolic blow to the UK that would come with independence.
Better to look at what the UK Government does in relation to Scotland than continue to listen to the endless stream of verbal assurances insisting they care.
I do believe the English and Scots have broadly the same values. The talk of Scottish progressiveness has probably been somewhat overdone in a country which in my lifetime had a private postal ballot on whether to continue banning discussion of gay people’s existence from schools. But that is irrelevant. Where the Scottish and English diverge is in voting behaviour. If the UK had not returned a Conservative government driven by English votes in 2015, there never would have been a Brexit referendum that no one outside a rabid fringe was calling for. If the English had voted like the Scottish in that referendum, we would not still potentially be just days away from a catastrophic No-Deal Brexit that no one said was on the cards. But here we are.
READ MORE: MPs could hold Boris Johnson 'hostage' over Brexit date
Voting patterns matter more than the values professed in polling. Voting choices have put us in the dire straits the UK is in today. And a voting choice can extract Scotland from this vicious cycle of disappointment with a UK seemingly hell-bent on damaging not just Scots but everyone else in Britain too.
In recent weeks the possibility of border controls between Scotland and England has been raised in the event of independence. Our borders are best when they’re invisible. There is a group which shares that view and has demonstrated its commitment to it through action. It’s the European Union. If controls appear at the Border with an independent Scotland in the EU, it will only be because the English have chosen not to sign up to the European norm, not because Scotland, like the vast majority of Europe, will have chosen to do so.
As an Englishman due to return south of that Border in February, I can only hope the rest of the UK would re-assess the situation in light of the new realities of a post-independence world and join Scotland and Ireland back in the EU. The choice will be for the rest of the UK to make.
I am by no means wedded to the idea of independence. Through serious reform Canada redefined itself after Quebec voted by less than 50.6 per cent against splitting off in 1995. It’s an outcome the Québécois seem happy with, as independence is no longer under serious discussion. Are the British ruling class willing to radically overhaul the UK? They would sooner just grant independence than go to the trouble.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel