ANTI-Brexit campaigners have launched a new legal challenge in Scotland to declare Boris Johnson's new Brexit deal with the EU unlawful.
Campaigner Jo Maugham QC, who was behind the bid to declare the successful bid to have the Prime Minister's proroguing of Parliament declared unlawful, is behind the new bid.
He has confirmed that a petition had been lodged at the Court of Session and is expected to be heard on Friday.
He is arguing that the new deal contravenes legislation that prevents Northern Ireland forming part of a separate customs territory to the rest of the UK.
READ MORE: Jean-Claude Juncker rules out granting UK Brexit extension
Section 55 of the Taxation (Cross-border Trade) Act 2018 prevents Northern Ireland from having different customs rules than the rest of the UK.
The clause titled 'Single United Kingdom customs territory' states: "It shall be unlawful for Her Majesty's Government to enter into arrangements under which Northern Ireland forms part of a separate customs territory to Great Britain."
And he is arguing any agreement which makes arrangements that puts Northern Ireland in a separate customs territory to Great Britain "cannot, lawfully" be laid before the Houses of Parliament.
The challenge is due to heard at 10am in the Outer House of the Court of Session before Lord Pentland.
The Democratic Unionist Party has said it will not support the new Brexit deal because it says it "undermines the integrity of the Union".
It says Northern Ireland's main route of trade on an east-west basis will be subject to rules of the European Union Customs Union, even thought it will reamin part of the UK Customs territory.
"All goods would be subject to a customs check regime regardless of their final destination," the DUP said.
"The default position, even for goods travelling from one part of our country to another, is that they are considered under the EU Customs code unless otherwise agreed.
"We recognised that only those goods ultimately destined for the Republic of Ireland would be subject to tariffs but the reality remains that the EU would have a veto on which goods would be exempt and which would not...
"This is not acceptable within the internal borders of the United Kingdom."
Mr Maugham claims that if the court finds the proposed agreement is unlawful Boris Johnson would be obliged to request an extension to Brexit negotiations, under the terms of the Benn Act which states that s the prime minister must ask the EU for a delay if Parliament does not agree a deal by Saturday.
The petition says that Section 44 is "clear in its terms" and that the government has "no discretion to decide not to follow its terms".
READ MORE: The hurdles Boris Johnson must jump to pass his Brexit deal
It says that defying the prohibitions set out in Section 55 would result in a "substantial and irreversible change" to the UK's constitution effected by "the carrying out of unlawful acts on the part of the UK government".
The petition says that Section 55 was derived from a backbench amendment sponsored by the European Research Group of Conservative MPs.
"The avowed intent of the promoters of that provision was to prevent the government from entering into any 'Northern Ireland backstop' arrangement under which, post-Brexit, the territory of Northern Ireland would continue to be associated with the customs territory of the European Union such as to avoid the need for any customs control between Northern Ireland and the EU...."
After details emerged of the Brexit deal, Mr Maugham said: "We do not understand how the government might have come to negotiate a withdrawal agreement in terms that breach amendments tabled by its own European Research Group.
"Unless and until Section 55 is repealed by the UK Parliament, it is simply not open, as a matter of law, for the United Kingdom to enter into such an agreement.
"If the proposed withdrawal agreement is unlawful, the government will be obliged to request an extension as mandated by the Benn Act and in accordance with undertakings given to the Court of Session in Vince, Maugham, Cherry v Boris Johnson."
Returning to this case, if the Governments wants to seek Parliament's consent to repeal section 55, it can and should seek that consent. But it must not negotiate unlawful trade deals and then present them to Parliament as a fait accompli. /7
— Jo Maugham QC (@JolyonMaugham) October 17, 2019
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel