Fake blood has been sprayed across the steps of the Treasury in central London by Extinction Rebellion protesters.
READ MORE: Extinction Rebellion protesters interrupt council debate
The demonstrators parked an old fire engine outside the building and a pool of red liquid – said to be 396 gallons (1,800 litres) of water coloured with food dye – lay opposite the entrance.
![Environment protest](http://image.assets.pressassociation.io/v2/image/production/af16b460fc1c37e895e1b15cb1eb8809Y29udGVudHNlYXJjaCwxNTcwMTgzNDE3/2.45790316.jpg?w=640)
Extinction Rebellion campaigners sprayed gallons of fake blood outside the Treasury in central London (Aaron Chown/PA)
Four protesters stood on top of the fire engine, which had a banner slung across it with the words “Stop funding climate death”.
Police said that four arrests have been made on suspicion of criminal damage.
Meanwhile, the group's eagerness to cut the country's emissions by 2025 would do more environmental harm than good, a UK Government tsar has claimed.
Dieter Helm, chairman of the Natural Capital Committee advisory group, said reaching the environment campaigners' net-zero target would lead to an increase in pollution through imports.
Speaking in Edinburgh, the University of Oxford economics and energy policy professor said the group's target would do "a hell of a lot of damage" as carbon emissions would just be created elsewhere.
READ MORE: Extinction Rebellion paint George Square blue
He told the PA news agency: "The cost will be so colossally high because you would have to change all existing capital stock - public resistance would be extremely destructive to dealing with it.
"The only way to get emissions down really quickly here would be to stop Scottish industry then import the pollution - we will make the climate even worse."
The group have also protested in Scotland
Prof Helm instead argues a net-zero carbon consumption would be a more effective way to reduce pollution.
He used the example of British Steel, whose closure would see a reduction in emissions being created in the UK but would then lead to the product being imported from countries like China.
He said: "Your impact on global warming will be to increase it."
It comes as Extinction Rebellion prepares to announce 60 protests worldwide calling for action on the "climate emergency".
The campaigners are urging the UK Government to "act now to halt biodiversity loss" and reduce greenhouse gas emissions to net-zero by 2025.
They say the issue cannot be put off any longer by setting the date for decarbonisation at 2050.
Green MSP Patrick Harvie with a protester
The Scottish Government has set an earlier target, with legislation having been passed committing Scotland to net-zero emissions by 2045.
The Natural Capital Committee provides advice to the UK Government on the sustainable use of its natural resources.
This includes forests, rivers, land, minerals and oceans. Its remit also covers the benefits from natural assets, such as food, recreation, clean water, hazard protection and clean air.
Prof Helm has argued for a single-level carbon tax to be introduced and for those who contribute to a net reduction in pollution to receive payment.
READ MORE: Extinction Rebellion designs to go on display at V&A
His three principles for a 25-year green plan are public money for public goods, polluters must pay, and there should be an environmental gain.
He said there has been a "wake-up call" that efforts to tackle climate change have not been working, but he believes his policies could create sustainable economic growth while also tackling global warming.
Prof Alston added: "Unless the environment is the core part we can't have sustainable economic growth, we can't have prosperity and we can't solve these problems."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here