MSPs have rejected calls from Labour for the Scottish Government to end the ScotRail franchise early.
The party had received backing from transport unions including Aslef, the TSSA and the RMT for rail in Scotland to be brought into public ownership.
But MSPs on Wednesday voted by 85 to 32 against the Labour proposal, which had urged the Government not to extend the franchise beyond its current expiry date of 2022.
Transport staff union TSSA reacted "with scorn" over the debate to bring Scotland's railways back into public ownership.
Scottish Labour – backed by TSSA and other rail unions – tabled the motion, urging the SNP Government to strip Abellio of the franchise by 2022 after it was claimed almost 75,000 ScotRail trains have been cancelled since the Dutch firm began running the franchise in 2015.
READ MORE: Call for inquiry as ScotRail apologises again for another day of rail chaos
Manuel Cortes said: “It’s clear to all and sundry that ScotRail are failing Scotland on a daily basis with this franchise. When will the SNP wake up to this and put the people of Scotland first rather than protect greedy shareholders?"
.@RMTunion members protesting outside the Scottish Parliament today and calling on the SNP to bring Abellio run ScotRail back into public ownership pic.twitter.com/V2lRf96i74
— RMT (@RMTunion) October 2, 2019
Earlier this month, the Scottish Government put plans in place to run the railways as an "operator of last resort" if ScotRail's performance fails to improve.
Abellio won the £6bn franchise to run ScotRail services for a decade in 2014.
But ministers can end this franchise three years early if it is felt the operator is not delivering on its commitments.
The move came after thousands of ScotRail services were cancelled after the winter timetable introduction 'chaos' because of staff shortages, leading to a series of apologies.
The scale of disruption caused by staff being trained how to operate new trains saw an average of 46 services a day axed towards the end of 2018.
READ MORE: ScotRail apologise over 'shambles' introduction of new winter timetable
Speaking at Holyrood, Scottish Labour MSP Colin Smyth warned against an extension of the current agreement.
"Extending the franchise, frankly, would reward failure," said Mr Smyth.
"It would send a signal to private rail operators that it doesn't matter how poor your performance is, you won't ever have to deliver on your franchise targets.
@ScotRail This is ridiculous Glasgow to Aberdeen,Sunday night,3 carriages? pic.twitter.com/GZmwv1lvVO
— 4Seas2Cernavoda (@4Seas2Cernavoda) September 29, 2019
"Ending the franchise in 2022, however, would give the Government two years to put in place a public sector operator bid.
"I hope in that time we'll see a change of UK Government - a Labour government would end the wasteful and inefficient franchising system altogether, repealing the Tories' 1993 Railways Act so we can have a proper public ownership of our railways, bringing train and track together under a single, publicly-owned company with all decisions being made here in Scotland on Scottish routes.
"Even members who don't support public ownership must see that the current franchise is just not working."
Transport Secretary Michael Matheson outlined investment of £8 billion made by the Scottish Government in rail improvements in Scotland, as well as setting high performance standards above those set elsewhere in the UK.
However, he acknowledged that elements of ScotRail's operations "have not performed to the levels specified and required by this Government".
READ MORE: How ScotRail's bid to create 'best railway Scotland has ever had' remains off track
Problems ovet the winter led to Abellio, the Dutch transport firm that runs ScotRail, having to submit a plan to the Scottish Government to address falling performance levels which if unsuccessful could have resulted in a breach of contract and the early loss of the franchise.
A total of 2,691 ScotRail services were cancelled due to a lack of staff between April 2018 and 16 January 2019.
Most of the disruption that hit Scots railways since the timetable launch in December 9 was due to ScotRail staff shortages, and the train operator has previously said that is partly because many have been undergoing training.
ScotRail said at the time that was partly caused by the late arrival of the new Hitachi Class 385 and high-speed InterCity trains.
The train operator said the lag in staff training was made worse as a result of RMT industrial action over a pay dispute that lasted several weeks but was resolved in December.
Mr Matheson called for MSPs to back the Government's aim to gain full public sector control of the structure, governance and operation of the Scottish railway system.
He said: "The existing franchise system is costly and complex. In my view it is no longer fit for purpose.
"Under current UK legislation we only have the power to franchise for the running of rail services in Scotland. We have secured the right for a public sector body to compete for a franchise, but it leaves us with the same broken franchise process and the complicated rail system we have today.
"Let me be clear, the decision on the future of the ScotRail franchise will be based on a rigorous and detailed evaluation of what is the right thing to do for passengers, communities and the taxpayer.
"But simply ending the contract early will not wave a magic wand to fix the challenges we have on our railways. And rushing into a decision to end a franchise early without correct due diligence would not be in passengers' or the Scottish taxpayers' interest."
The Transport Secretary also welcomed a rail review established by the UK Government, adding that it "has the potential to reform the structures of Scotland's railways in a positive way".
Scottish Conservative transport spokesman Jamie Greene questioned how cancelling the current contract would look to other franchisees.
He said: "Pulling the rug from under the feet of the current operator will do more harm than good.
"First of all, what message does that send? If you sign up to take on a franchise and invest billions of pounds and the political wind changes, they end your contract early."
Scottish Green transport spokesman John Finnie said: "I have to say, as a regular rail user I've experienced some of the frustration that others have.
"The public aren't interested in performance figures, they want to know that the train will turn up on time, and that it's clean.
WATCH: Here's the moment SNP MSPs teamed up with the Tories to block Scottish Labour's plan to end the failing Abellio ScotRail franchise. pic.twitter.com/zhuGmLbKjH
— Scottish Labour (@scottishlabour) October 2, 2019
"The operator of last resort? For vital public services the Government should be the operator of first and only resort."
Mike Rumbles, the Scottish Lib Dem transport spokesman, added: "We've had three remedial plans, not two, they've contained 249 action points, 20 improvement measures and now we have the current remedial plan with nine initiatives.
"Rather than endless initiatives and little improvement, the public simply want to have a railway that delivers the agreed level of service."
An Abellio ScotRail spokesman said afterwards: "We are pleased that Parliament has not taken a short term view of the future of Scotland's railway.
"It is vital the transformation of Scotland's railway continues. Our investment of £475 million has already delivered more services, more seats, more jobs and new trains at less cost to the taxpayer.
"We recognise that we need to deliver the railway customers expect and deserve, and we are committed to completing that job during this franchise."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel