BORIS Johnson has issued a direct challenge to the SNP and other smaller parties at Westminster to table a no-confidence motion in his government to force through an early General Election.
The Prime Minister did so as he said the UK Supreme Court was “wrong” to get involved in a political decision at a time of national controversy.
In a statement to the Commons Mr Johnson told opposition parties that he was prepared to give them a limited period of time to put down a confidence vote if they had the “courage to act”.
But the SNP, the Liberal Democrats and smaller parties as well as Labour have refused outright to back an election until a further delay to Brexit has been agreed.
Nicola Sturgeon took to Twitter to reject out of hand the PM’s offer, saying: “Johnson should stop his shameful game-playing. If he requests an extension and removes risk of no deal on 31 October, @theSNP will vote for an election. The ball’s in his court. But he must think we button up the back if he believes we’ll let him force through a no-deal Brexit.”
Mr Johnson was forced to cut short a trip to the United Nations in New York to address MPs after the court ruled that his suspension of Parliament was unlawful.
He accused Parliament of being "paralysed" and claimed its members were "sabotaging" Brexit negotiations by seeking to thwart his commitment to taking the UK out of the European Union on October 31, with or without a deal.
And he dared opposition parties to table a motion of no-confidence or back a general election in order to "finally face the day of reckoning with the voters".
Mr Johnson was humiliated by Tuesday's Supreme Court judgment which overturned his advice to the Queen to suspend Parliament until October 14.
The PM said it was "absolutely no disrespect to the judiciary to say I thought the court was wrong" to pronounce on a "political question at a time of great national controversy".
Claiming that MPs were trying to prevent Brexit entirely, he said: "The people at home know that this Parliament will keep delaying, it will keep sabotaging the negotiations because they don't want a deal."
In response, Jeremy Corbyn repeated his call for the PM to quit.
"After yesterday's ruling the Prime Minister should have done the honourable thing and resigned," he said.
Opposition parties will not back an election until they are sure that a no-deal Brexit is off the table and they are suspicious that Mr Johnson will not comply with the terms of the Benn Act which is aimed at delaying Brexit beyond the October 31 deadline if no agreement has been reached.
A defiant Mr Johnson taunted Mr Corbyn over his refusal to back an election.
“The people outside this House understand what is happening," he declared.
"Out of sheer selfishness and political cowardice they are unwilling to move aside and let the people have a say. The Leader of the Opposition and his party don't trust the people.
"All that matters to them is an obsessive desire to overturn the referendum result."
He added: "I wonder does he in his heart even want to be prime minister any more?"
Throwing down the gauntlet to the opposition parties, he said: "This Parliament must either stand aside and let this Government get Brexit done or bring a vote of confidence and finally face the day of reckoning with the voters."
The Labour leader dismissed the "bluster from a dangerous Prime Minister who thinks he is above the law", adding: "In truth, he is not fit for the office that he holds."
In an interview with ITV, Mr Johnson said he would both "respect the law" and leave the EU on October 31 - but again refused to say how.
He did not apologise for the suspension of Parliament, which was ordered by the Queen on his advice.
The row dragged the monarch into Westminster's bitter Brexit battle, but senior Cabinet minister Michael Gove said: "I don't think that the Government should apologise for having a strong domestic agenda, I don't think we should apologise also for seeking to advance our exit from the European Union.
"I don't think the Government should apologise also for saying that we are attempting to honour the democratic will of the British people."
Earlier, Attorney General Geoffrey Cox also faced questions about his legal advice which indicated the five-week suspension - known as prorogation - would be within the law.
Mr Cox told MPs he will consider whether the public interest might require a "greater disclosure" of advice given to the Government on the prorogation.
But he railed against the "dead Parliament" claiming MPs had no "moral right" to remain in the Commons, try to "block 17.4 million people's votes" and refuse to allow an election.
The response to the court case - including reported comments by Commons Leader Jacob Rees-Mogg describing it as a "constitutional coup" - have caused unease about the Government's attitude to the judiciary.
Mr Cox - speaking in the Commons with Mr Rees-Mogg watching on - said: "I don't think it was a constitutional coup", but "these things can be said in the heat of rhetorical and poetical licence".
Justice Secretary Robert Buckland defended the independence of "our world-class judiciary".
The resumption of the Parliamentary session could cause problems for the Tory conference, which is due to begin on Sunday and stretch until Wednesday.
If opposition MPs refuse to vote for a recess, the conference will have to be rejigged or curtailed, not least because Mr Johnson's leader's speech in Manchester would be on Wednesday when he would normally be expected to face Prime Minister's Questions in Parliament.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel