The earnings of top company executives in the UK have doubled in the past five years to a new record of more than £3m each, research revealed today.
Total pay of chief executives of the top 100 firms has reached "new heights" because of ever-increasing incentive payments, according to a study by pay analysts Incomes Data Services.
Over the same period, the average earnings of full-time workers across the country as a whole increased by £5000 to just in excess of £30,000 a year.
It follows reports from earlier in the month by accounting giant KPMG that chief executives enjoyed an average 16% rise in total remuneration in 2007, while other executive directors on company boards saw their base salaries increase at a similar rate.
In August, Sir Fred Goodwin, chief executive of the Royal Bank of Scotland, along with other top managers, was awarded shares which will see him take home around £3.6m, three times his basic salary, as well as his annual bonus.
Standard Life's top three executives received more than £5m in pay last year, despite shedding more than 5000 jobs in the past three years.
Sandy Crombie, Standard Life's chief executive, received more than £2.2m, a rise of £870,000 on 2005.
The IDS report said pay experts were now questioning the current level of boardroom earnings, adding that calls for action to limit wage growth were increasing.
A recent poll of pay experts by IDS found more than half thought executive directors were overpaid and two-thirds believed wage differentials were too wide.
Steve Tatton, one of the report's authors, said: "It is no surprise that the earnings of top directors continue to escalate given what's been happening to incentive scheme design.
"The potential maximum awards from all types of incentive scheme, bonus, share option and other long-term incentives have all been edging up and the rewards are being received today."
The trades union movement has reacted with anger at the findings, claiming it would be more honest if top executives said they paid themselves huge rises "because they can".
TUC general secretary Brendan Barber said: "Britain's top directors clearly have no shame. Year in, year out they have been paying themselves far bigger rises than they are prepared to pay their staff while lecturing the rest of us on the need for low taxes.
"It beggars belief that they are somehow working twice as hard as five years ago."
He added: "It is time the rest of us gave a big raspberry to all their hand-wringing excuses of needing the incentives and matching the international going rate.
"This is not just morally offensive greed, it is bad for the rest of society too. The growth of a new class of the super-rich, semi-detached from the rest of society, hits social cohesion, feeds into house price inflation and harms staff loyalty and commitment."
The study also found that earnings for chief executives of the FTSE-250 firms have increased by 90% since 2001-02 to an average of £1.4m each.
The salaries of directors in FTSE-350 firms rose by 9.3% in the past year alone compared with wage settlements across the economy as a whole of 3.5%, said IDS.
Chief executives in FTSE-100 firms were paid average salaries of £737,000 in the last financial year, but total earnings averaged £3,174,000 when incentive payments and share options were added.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article