Education Secretary John Swinney will today announce he is to repeal the controversial 'Named Person' laws which were rejected by the Supreme Court two years ago.
The Herald understands he will scrap parts 4 and 5 of the Children and Young People Act of 2014, which provided for a 'named person' to ensure the wellbeing of every young person in Scotland.
The policy was introduced to support the Scottish Government's child protection policy Getting it Right for Every Child (Girfec) and ministers have always maintained it is formalising what is already in place in many parts of the country.
Read more: Admit defeat on named person scheme, Scottish Government urged
However the plan faced an immediate backlash, with opponents warning it would be a 'snooper's charter', and it has faced legal challenges and question marks over resourcing and the workload of health visitors and headteachers - who are expected to be 'named persons' in most cases.
When the Supreme Court ruled on the issue in July 2016, judges declared the law - introduced in the Children and Young People Act of 2014 - was "unquestionably legitimate and benign" in its aims.
However they decided ministers had overstepped their legal competence in the provisions of the law which allowed public authorities to share information about young people.
Since then Mr Swinney has set up an expert panel which was charged with rewriting guidance to make the act compliant with the law and satisfy the concerns of the Supreme Court.
Read more: Swinney urges MSPs to reconsider Named Person bill delay
However the panel reported back to Government last month that redesigned information-sharing guidance was not the right thing to do and it was not possible to come up with workable rules that would be easy for people to understand.
That was followed by renewed calls for Mr Swinney to 'admit defeat' over the troubled legislation. A source told the Herald the education secretary's announcement this afternoon would withdraw the key elements relating to Named Persons.
The Scottish Government has been contacted for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel