Nicola Sturgeon has been challenged to ditch plans for a second independence referendum after a new poll suggested fewer than three out of 10 Scots want there to be another vote in the next 18 months.
Survation carried out the research for the pro-UK campaign group Scotland in Union, with the poll putting support for the Union at 59% – higher than the 55% who backed this in 2014.
But it asked a different question from that put to voters on the September 18 referendum – Should Scotland be an independent country?
Instead, pollsters asked “Should Scotland remain in the United Kingdom or leave the United Kingdom?” – with 41% of those surveyed supporting independence.
READ MORE: Petition launched to require two-thirds majority for independence
However, SNP depute leader Keith Brown accused Scotland in Union of “trying to rig the question”.
Mr Brown claimed: “This is desperate stuff from the opponents of independence, who are clearly running scared.”
The poll found more than a quarter of Scots (28%) said there should not be another independence referendum.
But with the First Minister having indicated she would like a second ballot to be held in the later part of 2020, 27% of those questioned said there should be another referendum within 18 months.
READ MORE: Readers react to petition requiring two-thirds majority for Scottish independence referendum
Meanwhile, 15% supported having another ballot between 18 months and five years’ time, 8% wanted this to be held between five and 10 years from now, and 13% said there should not be another referendum for at least a decade.
One in 10 people did not know about the timing of a possible second independence vote.
Pamela Nash, the chief executive of Scotland in Union, said: “Just five years on from the referendum that Nicola Sturgeon promised was a once-in-a-generation contest, this landmark poll shows that 59% of people in Scotland want to remain in the UK.”
Ms Nash, a former Labour MP, added: “More than half a million Scots who voted Yes in 2014 have now switched to supporting Scotland’s future in the UK to protect vital public services like the NHS and schools from the SNP’s drastic cuts.
“People are seeing the chaos that Brexit has brought, and know that Scotland leaving the UK would be much worse.
“Barely a quarter of people support the First Minister’s plan for a second referendum within 18 months, and she should now drop her reckless and deeply unpopular proposal.”
She insisted: “We are stronger together as part of the UK. It’s time to put the independence referendum divisions behind us and work towards a better future for Scotland as part of the UK, protecting public services and growing our economy, and building on our shared history and culture.”
Scottish Conservative leader Jackson Carlaw said: “This shows what we have spent five years telling the SNP – the people of Scotland don’t want to break up the UK, and they don’t want to have to deliver that verdict in another referendum.”
He added: “On the fifth anniversary of that referendum, this is a reaffirmation of how seriously Scots take our place at the heart of the UK.
READ MORE: Greens attack ‘conservative’ SNP on Indyref anniversary
“Perhaps after half a decade of trying to overturn the result from 2014, the nationalists should start to accept it.”
Mr Brown said the poll had “backfired spectacularly” as it showed “almost two-thirds of people are now in favour of another independence referendum”.
He continued: “Polling consistently shows support for independence up since 2014 – with most recent polls showing a referendum result is too close to call. More and more people are seeing the Westminster chaos which is failing Scotland and are turning to independence.
“Momentum is building towards a referendum, and when it comes, all the signs are that the people of Scotland will vote Yes.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel