Tory MPs have rounded on Luxembourg Prime Minister Xavier Bettel after he launched into Prime Minister Boris Johnson over Brexit in what some suspected was a deliberate ambush.
Mr Bettel infuriated many Conservatives after going ahead with a press conference on Monday alongside an empty podium where Mr Johnson had been supposed to be addressing the media.
Amid chaotic scenes outside Luxembourg’s Ministry of State, Mr Johnson walked out complaining a noisy anti-Brexit demonstration made it impossible to go ahead.
READ MORE: How the papers reacted to Boris Johnson's humiliating press conference
To cheers from the crowd, Mr Bettel then mounted an emotional onslaught, complaining the future of citizens across the EU was being held hostage for “party political gains”.
British officials were said to have asked for the press conference to have been moved inside, only to be told there was insufficient space to accommodate all the journalists present.
Pro-Brexit Tory Daniel Kawczynski said the scenes only underlined the need for Britain to get out of the “artificial arrogant EU structure” as quickly as possible.
“Luxembourg PM representing a nation smaller than Birmingham admonishing and being disrespectful to a British PM for trying to fulfil will of British people. We need to pull out of EU on October 31 without doubt!” he tweeted.
“We fund the EU to the tune of billions every year not sure what Luxembourg’s contribution has been.”
READ MORE: Greens attack ‘conservative’ SNP on Indyref anniversary
Former Brexit minister David Jones said Mr Bettel had made a “big mistake” which would appal many of his own people.
“I have no doubt that very many Luxembourgers are dismayed by their Prime Minister’s extraordinary behaviour,” he tweeted.
Even some pro-EU MPs supported Mr Johnson’s decision to walk out.
Sir Nicholas Soames, one of 21 MPs to have the Conservative whip removed by Mr Johnson for rebelling over Brexit, accused Mr Bettel of “unhelpful grandstanding”.
“Very poor behaviour by Luxembourg. Boris Johnson quite right not to be made a fool of,” he tweeted.
Conservative former defence minister Tobias Ellwood agreed that Mr Johnson had been right to “duck out” of the press conference.
“You saw the atmosphere outside the meeting. It is a bit like trying to conduct a press conference outside the Red Lion in Parliament Square,” he told BBC2’s Newsnight.
“It is the not the appropriate place to do it and I am sorry the choreography wasn’t better handled.”
At the same time, however, he acknowledged that Mr Bettel was giving voice to a widely-felt frustration over the continuing Brexit deadlock.
“Xavier Bettel illustrated the frustration that we are all feeling. It is three years since the referendum and we are still trying to secure a deal,” he said.
The row erupted as the UK’s highest court prepared to consider whether Mr Johnson’s five-week suspension of Parliament was lawful.
The Supreme Court in London will hear appeals from two separate challenges brought in England and Scotland to the prorogation of Parliament over three days, starting on Tuesday.
Mr Johnson, who also met European Commission president Jean-Claude Juncker on Monday, insisted a deal was still possible before the UK is due to leave the EU on October 31.
“We’ve got to manage this carefully. Yes, we’ve got a good chance of a deal. Yes, I can see the shape of it. Everybody could see roughly what could be done. But it will require movement,” he said.
In contrast, however, the commission said it was the UK’s responsibility to bring forward “legally operational solutions” to the issue of the Northern Ireland backstop which remains the main obstacle to an agreement.
In a statement issued after Mr Juncker’s working lunch with Mr Johnson at Le Bouquet Garni restaurant, the commission said “such proposals have not yet been made”.
Meanwhile, the DUP’s chief whip in Westminster Sir Jeffrey Donaldson told RTE Radio that he believed a deal could be struck which would allow an open border in Ireland.
He told the broadcaster: “Where there is political will, there is certainly a way.
“I think it is still possible to get that agreement.
“We want to avoid a hard border on the island so we are looking at ways in which we can find practical solutions that address this.
“We will continue to have an input into the formulation of the proposals by the UK government which I believe are gathering apace, so I believe it is possible to find practical solutions to the concerns not only that we have but also the Irish government have as well.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel