Justice Secretary Humza Yousaf has backed a possible moratorium on loyalist and republican marches in Glasgow.
Humza Yousaf said that "Glasgow had had enough" of the violence and disruption that recent marches have caused.
It comes as loyalists plan to gather on Saturday morning in George Square to protest against a council decision to ban loyalist and republican marches through the city this weekend.
Senior members of the Grand Orange Lodge of Scotland have claimed Glasgow City Council’s decision to prohibit six parades on Saturday and Sunday is illegal.
Mr Yousaf gave his full support to the "idea of exploring if there can be a moratorium on loyalist and republican marches in Glasgow to allow us to find a longer term solution".
He spoke as Glasgow City Council leader Susan Aitken said: "We need to step back for a bit and have a period without these marches."
Violence has flared at parades in the city over the past two weekends, with police responding to "significant disorder" at a march in Govan on August 30.
The following weekend, 11 people were arrested as two Republican marches were held through Glasgow city centre, with a police officer injured by a pyrotechnic thrown by loyalist protesters.
The council has now stepped in to halt six marches by loyalist and republican groups which were due to take place this weekend - with First Minister Nicola Sturgeon describing this as the "right decision".
But Jim McHarg, Grand Master of the Orange Lodge said: “It is a sad day for democracy when a narrow-minded band of anti-unionist nationalist councillors, aided and abetted by Police Scotland, abuse the law and introduce illegal measures that curtail a citizen’s right of peaceful assembly.”
Ms Aitken said that the "whole atmosphere and circumstances" of the parades had changed - and that the council had acted on police advice in prohibiting this weekend's marches.
Speaking on BBC Radio Scotland's Good Morning Scotland programme, she said: "The responses and the violence and the destruction we have seen on the city streets is simply unacceptable. We can't have repeats of that.
"And nor can we continue to have repeats of the very, very heavy police presence that was on the city streets last Saturday. Although that was a very robust policing response it is not sustainable or desirable to constantly have 400-plus officers in full public order gear in the city streets every weekend."
A moratorium on marches is being considered to "find that right balance" between the right to march and the need to protect the city, she added.
"What we need is some breathing space, we need to be able to step back."
Ms Aitken continued: "We need to understand the situation and the organisers of the traditional parades must engage in this as well.
"They need to step up and give some confidence and some guarantees that we're not going to see a repeat of the violence of recent weeks, and at the moment I don't think anyone is convinced they are able to do that."
She said advice from Police Scotland had warned of a "risk" if this weekend's marches went ahead.
The council leader stated: "Our only concern is about marches where there is this risk of unacceptable disruption to the life of the community. Other marches can go ahead.
"No-one wants to interfere with the right of citizens, the city's streets belong to the citizens and they are entitled to use them either to express an opinion or to celebrate a faith day or for whatever reason.
"But they cannot do that if they are going to cause violence and unacceptable disruption to the lives of the city and to communities.
"At the moment there are some marches where the risk of that is very high, and until we get some kind of confidence and guarantee that we are not going to see a repeat of that then we need to step back for a bit and have a period without these marches."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel