On the day he is due to die at Dignitas a terminally ill man has made a final plea to politicians to enable people in his situation to end their lives at home.
Richard Selley, 65, from Perth, who was diagnosed with Motor Neurone Disease (MND) in 2015, said the law change would be “too late” for him but would enable other terminally ill people to “die peacefully”.
In a final video message before his planned death on Friday, the former head of Loretto junior school in East Lothian called on MSPs to support an assisted dying Bill.
READ MORE: Neil Mackay: Right to die is the last great human rights battle
He said: “I hope that members of the Scottish Parliament support an assisted dying Bill in the future.
“I think the momentum for a change in the law is growing.
“It will be too late for me, but I hope that sometime soon people in my position will have the choice to have a peaceful death at a time of their choosing.”
He added: “Since my diagnosis with MND four years ago, I have lost the ability to walk, talk and swallow.
“I have also lost most of the power in my arms.
“Despite these losses I have tried very hard to remain positive and my palliative care has been outstanding.
“However, as I enter the final stage of my journey, I don’t wish to suffer for much longer so I am seeking an assisted death with Dignitas.
“Despite what some people think, Dignitas do not let people simply fly to Zurich, knock on their door and ask to die.
“I have already had to compose letters, write a life story and obtain medical records that prove that I am terminally ill.
“This has been stressful, particularly as my GP was advised to refuse my request for an up-to-date medical report.”
He said the cost attending of the clinic in Switzerland is about £10,000 which he is “fortunate” he can afford, as others cannot.
“Having to be able to fly means that I am choosing to die earlier than I would prefer”, he added.
“If an assisted death was possible in Scotland, I would be able to die at a time of my choosing, at home.”
Holyrood has twice considered Bills aims at introducing assisted suicide, with these having brought forward by independent MSP Margo MacDonald and, following her death from Parkinson’s disease, Green MSP Patrick Harvie.
However, these both failed to get enough support to proceed through the Scottish Parliament.
Sarah Wootton, chief executive of the campaign group Dignity In Dying, which released Mr Selley’s video, said: “Richard and his wife Elaine have shown immense bravery and dignity in sharing their story and speaking out about the injustice they have both suffered under the UK’s outdated, broken law in their final weeks together.”
She added: “If we are serious about improving end of life care in this country and ensuring that everyone has the death that’s right for them, assisted dying must be part of the conversation.”
READ MORE: The issue of the week: Assisted dying legislation
Gordon Macdonald, chief executive of campaign group Care Not Killing, said it is “sad” Mr Selley’s case is being used to “try and justify a campaign that will rip up long held universal protections, by treating those who are terminally ill, disabled, or have chronic conditions differently in law”.
He added: “Such a change in the law will put vulnerable people at risk of abuse and of coming under pressure to end their lives prematurely.”
A Scottish Government spokesman said: “We empathise with Mr Selley and his loved ones and with anyone suffering from long-term, debilitating illness and pain.
“The Scottish Government respects the will of the Scottish Parliament on assisted dying, and is committed to ensuring that everyone has dignity and respect at the end of their life.
“Scotland is widely recognised for providing high-quality care in this area and we support greater public and personal discussion of bereavement, death, dying and care at the end of life.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here