IT has been known as Scotland's centre of Christian forgiveness since the 6th century, ever since St Columba arrived on a mission to spread the gospels among the heathen tribes of Scotland.
But in recent months there has been little charity to be found between the local authority and residents of Iona, after a bitter dispute broke out over plans to bring in parking charges as expensive as those in some of the country's biggest cities.
Psalms were put aside for legal salvos as islanders warned the £9-a-day levy could cost them hundreds of pounds each year, and take a sledgehammer to the island's finely-balanced economy.
And now Argyll and Bute Council has issued a grovelling apology after apparently seeing the light, although the Iona residents believe the climbdown has more to do with the robustness of their case.
The ferry docks at Craignure on Mull
The backlash came after council leader Aileen Morton's moved to introduce the parking levy at the port of Fionnphort on Mull, which has the only ferry connection to Iona.
Visitor vehicles have been banned from Iona since 1978 in an effort to preserve the island, which still hosts a faith community at its famous abbey.
The council's parking planned charge was more expensive than some Edinburgh city centre parking permits, and not that far off London's £11.50-a-day congestion charge.
READ MORE: Iona revolts after council imposes £9-a-day parking poll tax
Shiona Ruhemann, Convenor of Mull and Iona Community Council, said that no thought had been put into how the charge would affect people living on the island or those who work there during the day and leave their cars behind.
She said: "This was a blanket attempt to impose big city charges into a situation where it just would not work.
"The process was completely flawed and there was no real or meaningful consultation with people on Iona, which there has to be by law before this type of charge is introduced. Iona is an island off and island and this would have taken a wrecking ball to our economy.
"Visitors coming to see islanders, teachers who work in the primary school and even the ferry workers who maintain the lifeline service between Fionnphort on Mull and Iona would have been left with bills of hundreds of pounds a year."
Iona Abbey
The Community Council turned to the Govan Law Centre to mount their legal challenge, and Ms Ruhemann said that their case had been airtight.
She said: "It has been surreal. We have found ourselves turning to lawyers to protect ourselves from our own council and the people who are supposed to represent us.
"I hope that lessons are learned and we can rebuild trust by finding out how on earth this happened and by making sure that it does not happen again."
A report will go to next week’s Oban, Lorn and the Isles (OLI) Area Committee recommending that the disputed traffic regulation order (TRO) which imposed the charge be revoked, and also that ways are identified of improving the council’s engagement with communities around similar issues.
READ MORE: Islanders ‘gagged’ at debate as ferry car park charges approved
Announcing the U-0turn, Argyll and Bute Council Chief Executive Cleland Sneddon, said: “Concerns had been raised with the council, by local people, about the need for better managed and safer parking, issues which had to be addressed. To do so a TRO was required.
"We have to apologise unreservedly to the people of Mull and Iona, however, for a flawed exercise – with our biggest regret being the negative impact this has had on relationships between residents of Mull and Iona, and the council.
"We want to work with as well as for local people. We had carried out a consultation exercise. The exercise though was not as robust as it should have been, it should have covered Iona as well as Mull."
He added: "The report also includes a key recommendation that we find ways to improve how we engage with our communities around TROs. Improved engagement will ensure that the differing needs of Mull and Iona are identified, and that we work better together in addressing them.
"We can assure residents that we have learned lessons from this, and that we remain committed to working with our communities to deliver parking arrangements that work for the residents and visitors of Mull and Iona.”
The report will be published on the council’s website overnight from 4th September, along with other reports for consideration by the OLI Committee.
Argyll and Bute's Oban North and Lorn Councillor Julie McKenzie, who voted against imposing the TRO, said: "I'm delighted to see this turnaround, because that is what it is.
READ MORE: CalMac hits out at council after ferry in ‘near-miss’at ‘too dark’ pier
"This parking charge should never have happened. The people of Mull and Iona have to be congratulated in bringing this forward in the way that they have.
"They highlighted the flaws in the scheme which showed it had just not been thought through, and I hope this heralds a new dawn in the council deals with communities by listening to them rather than imposing policies from the top down."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel