THE UK Government will today defend its decision to suspend Parliament “robustly” in court in Edinburgh as MPs try to reverse Boris Johnson’s move in what they believe is a bid to ride roughshod over British democracy and force through a no-deal exit.
As the judge at the Court of Session prepared to hear a full hearing on the issue, the Prime Minister’s spokesman set out the Government’s reasoning for suspending Parliament, saying: “As we have set out, the Government needs to bring forward a strong domestic legislative agenda; proroguing Parliament is the legal and necessary way of delivering this.
"We will defend our position robustly. Anyone seeking to frustrate the Government's ability to set its policy agenda through court action should note the decision made in the Court of Session to reject the request for an interim injunction to delay prorogation."
Asked if the Government would appeal the ruling if it went against it, the spokesman declined to answer.
Commenting ahead of the hearing the SNP’s Joanna Cherry, QC, the lead petitioner in the case, said: “The dogs in the street know the real reason for the suspension of Parliament and it is now clear from statements made in public by Ben Wallace, the Secretary of State for Defence, Jacob Rees-Mogg, the Lord President of the Privy Council, and the Prime Minister himself, that the true intention behind the decision to prorogue Parliament is to prevent Parliament from holding the Government to account for its conduct of Brexit preparations...That purpose is unconstitutional and unlawful.”
The MP for Edinburgh South West said she and her parliamentary colleagues had “good prospects of success”.
She added: “Although we are in uncharted territory, it is significant that a number of separate legal teams have reached the same view as us and that litigation is proceeding in Northern Ireland and in London.”
Fellow petitioner, Labour’s Ian Murray, said: “This court action has been taken because we believe it is unconstitutional for any minister to deny sufficient time for proper parliamentary scrutiny of Brexit.
“We are seeking to prevent Boris Johnson proroguing Parliament and riding roughshod over British democracy.
“At the same time, in Parliament we will seek to prevent a catastrophic no-deal Brexit, and I urge Scottish Conservative MPs in particular to put the country before their party,” added the MP for Edinburgh South.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel