IT’s the flagship rail service between Scotland’s biggest cities.
Trains - many of them new and all of them electric - every 15 minutes shuttle between Glasgow and Edinburgh every 15 minutes
Or at least they should. This summer, in fact, nearly one in four ScotRail’s services on the core route was more than five minutes late or failed to run at all.
And that was before a calamitous evening on Saturday when the franchise was forced to cancel services just as the busiest day of the Edinburgh festivals was ending.
ScotRail yesterday apologised for weekend scenes described, reportedly, by one member of staff at Waverley Station as the worse they had experienced in a quarter of a century.
Tempers flared on overcrowded platforms and trains - dangerously so, said some eyewitnesses - as what are thought to be thousands of festival-goers and rugby fans tried to get home.
This was just a continuation of a summer from hell. The Public Performance Measure (PPM) for Edinburgh and Glasgow, or E&G as the route is called, was 76% in the four weeks between July 21 and August 17. That is the percentage of trains which ran within five minutes of their advertised timetable.
That number was down from 84% yearly on a rolling 12-month measure. It has not been easy on the route this summer, with problems often caused by things well out of the control of ScotRail, if not Network Rail, its state-owned track and infrastructure provider.
Winchburgh tunnel outside Edinburgh was flooded in mid-August, there was a signals failing at Haymarket and a problem with an overhead wire at Newbridge.
This weekend’s problems included a train breakdown, somebody trespassing on the line and drivings failing to show up for work or what ScotRail called “late call-offs”.
David Simpson, ScotRail’s Operations Manager, explained: “We had a plan for Saturday and that plan didn’t go well.
“We had more customers than we’ve seen in previous weekends in August which had worked quite well but I think with international rugby and the football being on the number of customers we had was excessive.
Speaking to BBC Radio Scotland, he added: “We also had a trespass incident at Curriehill, we had a train failure, and between them that meant that trains weren’t able to run as planned and that caused the crowd and congestion that we heard about through social media.”
But the dry PPM figures give a bigger picture. And that is that Scotland’s busiest and most important railway is also among its least reliable.
So the last four-weekly reporting period saw ScotRail as a whole secure a relatively respectable 88% figure on its PPM, despite Highland and E&G lines devastated by flooding. That was actually an improvement on the moving annual figure of just under 88%. ScotRail’s target is to get 92% of its trains within five minutes of advertised time.
So why is E&G worse than average, at 76%. And why does it persistently underperform? After all nearly three quarters of a billion has been spent electrifying the route.
The TSSA, one of the unions representing workers, pinned blame for Saturday’s scenes on management. It was “symptomatic” of how the company is being run it said. On Satursday, accross the network, the PPM was 80.7%. ScotRail was unable to say how many trains it had cancelled on Saturday or how many people’s travel plans had been affected.
A spokesman said: “We are now undertaking a full review of Saturday night’s events to find out exactly what went wrong, and learn any lessons to ensure we do better in future.”
The TSSA’s general secretary, Manuel Cortes, wants ministers, not ScotRail, to get to the bottom of poor performance on E&G this weekend. “No-one coming home from Scotland’s capital should expect to be squashed in to trains like cattle at 11:30pm,. Festival or no Festival.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here