SNP activists are to be given the chance to oust the party boss who trashed a grassroots plan to secure independence without a referendum.
National Secretary Angus MacLeod rubbished the idea of a “Plan B” when it was proposed by SNP MP Angus MacNeil and Inverclyde Councillor Chris McEleny in July.
Mr MacLeod said it was “hastily written, almost whimsically so”, and said it had been “utterly inappropriate” for the two proposers to discuss it in the media.
READ MORE: SNP mavericks suggest a new route to independence
Now, in a key test of the party’s mood, Mr McEleny is challenging Mr MacLeod, seen as the choice of the SNP establishment, for the national secretary’s position.
Delegates to the party’s autumn conference in Aberdeen will vote on the issue in October.
Held by Mr MacLeod since 2016, the top office bearer's position involves overseeing the party’s constitution, nominations to party bodies and discipline issues.
Nicola Sturgeon has insisted a second referendum on independence must follow the “gold standard” of 2014, and involve a legally watertight transfer of power from Westminster.
However, with the UK Government refusing to grant a so-called Section 30 order, Mr MacNeil and Mr McEleny proposed a Plan B that doesn’t rely on a referendum.
Instead, a simple election win would be used as a mandate for ending the Union.
If pro-independence SNP and Green candidates won a majority of seats at the next Westminster or Holyrood election, it would trigger independence negotiations.
With parts of the Yes movement impatient for action, and worried about another refusal, Mr MacNeil and Mr McEleny tried to get their idea debated at the autumn conference.
However the SNP's conferences committee threw it out, and Mr MacLeod was directly critical of it.
The pair then attempted a different route, trying to get the same issue debated at conference through an amendment to a motion which had been accepted for debate.
READ MORE: SNP MP 'utterly stumped' by party's refusal to debate independence plan
But this too was rejected last week.
Cllr McEleny, who sits on the SNP’s ruling national executive, is understood to be “bitterly disappointed at the way his Plan B proposal was “arrogantly dealt with”.
His candidacy will be seen as a test of the mood among SNP members for a more aggressive push on Indyref2 and greater autonomy for the party’s grassroots.
Cllr McEleny said he wanted SNP HQ to work better with party members and improve candidate vetting for elections.
He said: “Branches across Scotland have been debating the merits of ‘Indy plan B’.
“An overwhelming majority who have had the chance to debate the policy have endorsed the proposal - in most cases unanimously, and even then the feedback has been that every single branch has had a vibrant debate.
“If we don’t stand for vibrant policy debates, what type of policy debates do we stand for?”
READ MORE: Neil Mackay: Why the Plan B path to independence reveals a world of pain for the SNP
He added: “My branch have nominated me for the position but this is an internal role.
“I do note that people have started social media campaigns already but for me my current priority is getting on with the day job of protecting local services from the impact of a Tory no deal Brexit.
“I will naturally set out to members what I intend to deliver in the role in terms of a better involving ordinary members in the party, nearer the time of the party conference in October.”
Mr MacLeod is standing for re-election for the unpaid role with the endorsement of several SNP MSPs and MPs, and will be seen as the choice of party leadership.
Also standing is activist Morgwn Davies.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel