SWATHES of rural and western Scotland have experienced population decline in recent years as people continue to leave remote areas and move to cities.
Around 80 per cent of “data zones” in the Western Isles and Inverclyde saw the number of people living there drop, adding to concerns around long-term depopulation.
Figures show that over the last seven years, rural and island councils had the highest percentage of data zones – small areas used to provide local statistics – which experienced population falls.
In contrast, 70% of data zones in Edinburgh saw a rise in population, alongside 57% in Glasgow.
READ MORE: Islands which are not growing in population must be given greater self-determination
Chris McEleny, SNP opposition leader at Inverclyde Council, called for part of the Scottish Government’s next budget to go towards a “specific, targeted fund” to help drive repopulation in the worst hit communities.
He said it was something the council is “absolutely” concerned about.
He added: “We have had various guises of repopulation strategy for the last 15 to 20 years.
“There’s been so many different things that the council has been trying, and without saying that they have all been a failure, they have not brought the success we were hoping to find.
“One of the main issues is birth rate versus death rate. We have had a real decline in birth rate, while people are living a lot longer.”
Mr McEleny said ensuring good quality jobs, housing, schools and transport is crucial – as well as encouraging migration.
Kenny John Macleod, chair of the communities and housing committee at Comhairle nan Eilean Siar, formerly Western Isles Council, also said it is “very concerned” about depopulation.
He said the problem is not simply confined to young people moving to the mainland, but also takes in those moving from more rural island communities into centres such as Stornoway.
He added: “A number of our rural communities are in desperate need of new blood and investment. That continues to be a priority for the local government.”
Mr Macleod said depopulation has an impact on everything, from housing to education and social care.
He said the council now aims to target 55 per cent of its social housing at remote areas.
As of June last year, Scotland’s population was 5,438,100 – an increase of 13,300 people (0.2%) since mid-2017.
READ MORE: Scotland's prison population rose by the equivalent of a new jail last year, watchdog warns
The majority of Scots (71%) live in large urban and other urban areas, defined as settlements of 10,000 people or more.
Large urban areas have enjoyed the highest net migration every year since 2011, with between 5,210 to 18,730 more people moving in than out of these areas.
But while accessible rural areas have seen a notable population rise, remote small towns have declined.
Rural and island councils also struggle with the highest proportion of data zones where residents have a median age of 54 or over.
In Argyll and Bute and South Ayrshire, around one in four data zones fall into this category.
Meanwhile, four of the six council areas which had the largest proportion of data zones that increased in population were cities.
There are 6,976 data zones covering the whole of Scotland, sitting within council areas. Each is designed to have a population of approximately 500 to 1,000 household residents.
In terms of Holyrood constituencies, Greenock and Inverclyde has seen the biggest population fall since 2011, dropping by 4% from 75,974 to 72,866. In contrast, Glasgow Kelvin saw its population rise by 17%, from 79,921 to 93,212.
The latest figures are contained in the small area population estimates published by National Records of Scotland.
Earlier this year, the Scottish Government launched a new ministerial task group to address population challenges.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel