HUMZA Yousaf has admitted he struggles with the name of the Scottish National Party and its associations.
The Justice Secretary said he would have chosen a different name at its foundation "because of the connotations of nationalism"
His comments echo those made by First Minister Nicola Sturgeon in 2017, who said she would change the name if she could turn back the clocks.
Mr Yousaf was taking part in an on-stage interview during the Edinburgh Festival Fringe.
Asked by an audience member if it is time to drop the "national" part of the SNP, he said: "I do struggle with it, because people do associate it with all the various elements of nationalism that exist.
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf would like to meet his racist trolls
"But the SNP, when the name came into being it was meant to be the national party of Scotland – not just for one particular part of Scotland, but it would cover everything.
"I think the brand is so strongly associated that a name change would be difficult and challenging.
"But I think if I was in those discussions when the SNP was made, I would have thought of perhaps looking at a different name because of the connotations of nationalism."
He added: "Now, for me, I don't think anybody that really knows the SNP, knows the people involved in the SNP, knows the core of the SNP, thinks that we are associated at all with that nasty, right-wing nationalism, at all.
"Not to say that there aren't bad apples who support us and whatever else, and we must weed them out, root them out.
"But the core of where we are is nothing to do with those nefarious elements of nationalism.
"I think people understand that we are an open and inclusive party.
"But do I think that the name can present us with some challenges? For sure."
Ms Sturgeon previously said the word "national" can be "hugely problematic".
Speaking at the Edinburgh International Book Festival in 2017, she said: "If I could turn the clock back, what 90 years, to the establishment of my party, and choose its name all over again, I wouldn't choose the name it has got just now, I would call it something other than the Scottish National Party."
Elsewhere, Mr Yousaf insisted it would be "utterly foolish if not downright stupid" for the independence movement not to learn lessons from the disastrous Brexit process.
READ MORE: SNP ministers nationalise Clyde shipyard
He said: "We have to learn that and understand that when it comes to Scotland becoming independent and when we do become independent – we will become independent, there's no doubt in my mind in the slightest about that – that when we do, that we must understand there's a range of opinions out there, there will have been people that will have voted no, and take them with us.
"So not going to extremes, which is what Theresa May did to try to appeal to the hard Brexiteers, not going to the fringes.
"Not going to extremes but taking people with us, is going to be a hugely important part of that process."
He said the Yes movement "has to look at the arguments and where we lost the arguments".
He added: "Person after person said to me that the economic case was just not strong enough."
However, Mr Yousaf insisted the Growth Commission – the SNP's controversial blueprint for independence – paints a "realistic picture".
He said: "It doesn't tell you that independence is going to be a land of milk and honey, because it ain't.
"We are going to have challenges, like any other country has."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article