UP TO one-third of new cases of childhood asthma in Europe could be caused by air pollution, a study has found.
Hundreds of thousands of children aged from one to 14 are believed to have been made ill each year by breathing in pollutants, researchers estimate.
Around 1.1 million children are believed to suffer from asthma in the UK. It is thought that pollution from traffic can damage airways, leading to inflammation and the development of asthma in children who are genetically predisposed to the condition.
The study, led by the Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), looked at asthma in 63,442,419 children across 18 European countries, including the UK, in 2016.
Read more: Salbutamol's first tester was a young Scot - and he nearly died
They compared asthma incidence rates with estimations of levels of exposure to pollutants in more than 1.5 million square km areas in 2010, which are often traffic-related in urban areas. Finally, they estimated how rates could be affected if levels were reduced in two different scenarios.
They found that 11.4 per cent of the total cases of asthma (66,567) could be prevented each year if countries adhered to the maximum air pollution levels recommended by the World Health Organisation (WHO) for the tiny particles known as PM2.5. This equates to more than 10,000 cases in the UK being prevented each year.
But only 0.4% (2,434 cases) across the 18 countries would be prevented with the reduction of another pollutant, nitrogen dioxide (NO2), which is a better marker of traffic sources.
The researchers said they believe the guidelines are outdated and need to be lowered. If the 18 European countries went further, tens of thousands more cases of childhood asthma could be avoided, the researchers predict.
In the UK for instance, 44,895 cases (29% of the UK total) could be avoided if the country reduced air pollution to the lowest levels recorded in 41 previous studies. Similarly, 191,883 cases (33%) could be avoided each year across the 18 European countries in the study.
For the N02 pollutant, 135,257 (23%) cases could be stopped if the countries adhered to the lowest levels – 40,000 of which were in the UK (26% of the UK total).
If a third pollutant, black carbon, was reduced to the lowest level, 19,139 cases in the UK and 89,191 cases across the 18 countries could be avoided annually.
Professor Mark Nieuwenhuijsen, an author of the study from the Barcelona Institute for Global Health, said “major lifestyle changes” in the UK would be needed to reach the lowest levels, as recorded in Scandinavian countries.
Read more: Avoidable child death rate in Scotland highest in UK
He said: “A lot of the air pollution we have comes from cars, residential cooking and heating, industry and ports, so what you need to get rid of is the fossil fuels that produce all this pollution.
“And, besides that, what you also might want to look at is a reduction of cars in cities because, even if you get electric cars, if they run on renewable energy you still have particulate matter coming from the brakes, tyres and the wear and tear of the car.
“It will reduce NO2 levels, but only 50% or so of the PM2.5 levels.
“So you are also looking towards a reduction of cars and a move towards public transportation, cycling or walking.”
The study, published in the European Respiratory Journal, concluded: “Our estimates are larger than previous documentation and underline the urgent need to reduce children’s air pollution exposure across Europe.”
Lead author Haneen Khreis, lead author of the study and a researcher at the Texas A&M Transportation Institute, said: “Only in the past two years, several analyses on air pollution and onset of childhood asthma have emerged, strengthening the case from different research teams that air pollution is contributing substantially to the burden of paediatric asthma.
“Largely, these impacts are preventable and there are numerous policy measures which can reduce the ambient levels of, and children’s exposures to, outdoor air pollution.
“We can and should do something about it.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here