The 27-year prison sentence for the teenager who abducted, raped and murdered Alesha MacPhail was “excessive and a miscarriage of justice”, an appeal court has heard.
Aaron Campbell took the six-year-old from her bed at her grandparents’ home on the Isle of Bute on July 2 last year.
Earlier this year, the now 17-year-old Campbell was found guilty at the High Court in Glasgow and handed a life sentence with a minimum of 27 years.
READ MORE: Alesha MacPhail's killer, Aaron Campbell, to start life sentence appeal
![Alesha MacPhail murder trial](http://image.assets.pressassociation.io/v2/image/production/4a114ae8267668ade21ff1562f2170daY29udGVudHNlYXJjaCwxNTY1MTkyMTA1/2.43210928.jpg?w=640)
His appeal was heard before three judges at the Criminal Appeal Court in Edinburgh, with Alesha’s parents Robert MacPhail and Georgina Lochrane in the gallery.
Campbell was linked into the courtroom via video, showing no emotion during the hearing.
The grieving mother kept her eyes on her child’s murderer throughout much of it.
The killer’s lawyer, Brian McConnachie QC, argued it would be difficult for Campbell to be rehabilitated due to him being “middle-aged” by the time he could be considered for release so a shorter sentence makes “more sense”.
He said: “The question of whether he will be released will depend on the view of the Parole Board and upon them reaching a conclusion that it would be safe to release him.
“I accept, as does the appellant, that day may never come.
“Due to the appellant’s age, the punishment selected was excessive and amounts to a miscarriage of justice.”
He added: “If one maintains a punishment period as it is then the appellant will be 43 years of age before the issue (of his release) is perhaps considered to any degree.
“The appellant will have been in custody for the entire period he has been on this Earth, plus another 11 years.”
READ MORE: Margaret Taylor: Even monsters like Aaron Campbell have a right to be defended
The lawyer went on to argue the sentencing judge had overly-focused on “pessimistic” background reports when choosing the minimum jail term.
He said: “In placing so much emphasis on the negative prospects of reintegration, this effectively disallowed the opportunity for progress to be made up until that period.
“When one is dealing with a child, it would make much more sense to give that opportunity because one knows there’s the ultimate arbiter of whether someone is or can be rehabilitated into society with the Parole Board.”
![Alesha MacPhail murder trial](http://image.assets.pressassociation.io/v2/image/production/861391f2064c9310dbf1c2b7dbf47c29Y29udGVudHNlYXJjaCwxNTY1MjY2MzE1/2.44536613.jpg?w=640)
During the nine-day trial in March, he told the jury about how he would “never do something like that” when asked if he had killed Alesha.
But a friend had shown detectives messages he sent in 2017, saying he “might kill 1 day for the lifetime experience”.
Campbell also tried to convince the jury he had sex with Toni McLachlan, the girlfriend of Alesha’s father Robert MacPhail, on the night of the murder.
After carrying out the atrocity, Campbell exchanged messages with Ms McLachlan, who he later tried to blame for the crime, saying of the missing girl: “Oh damn am sure she’s not went too far.”
He later confessed the crime to those assessing him ahead of the sentencing, saying he was “quite satisfied by the murder”.
Alesha, from Airdrie, North Lanarkshire, had been staying with her family on the island during the summer holidays.
Following the discovery of her body it was Campbell’s mother who called police in an apparent bid to eliminate her son from their inquiries.
Judge Lady Dorrian said a decision on the appeal would be made in writing in “due course”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel