BORIS Johnson has appeared unsure about how many referendums on Scottish independence there have been.
On a visit to Faslane Naval Base, his first visit to Scotland as Prime Minister, he hesitated before saying there was only one that he could remember.
There has only ever been one, although Nicola Sturgeon wants to hold a second in the latter half of 2020, or earlier if there is a no-deal Brexit.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon tells Boris Johnson: Brexit offers 'no democracy' for Scotland
Asked whether he would rule out an independence referendum in his premiership, Mr Johnson said: “In 2014 there was a historic vote. I think it was the only one there’s been in my lifetime that I can remember? Yes, it was.
“The only vote on Scottish independence that I can remember in my lifetime, and I’m 55, is the only time it’s happened. It was decisive. There was, I think, at least a 10-point margin.
“Everybody made clear at the time, in 2014, even the Scottish Nationalist party [sic] I seem to recollect, said that this was a once in a generation vote, and I think that the confidence of the public in politicians would be undermined yet further if we were to go back on that and hold another referendum. It was clear, it was decisive. The Union is the most successful political partnership anywhere in the world, let’s keep it going.”
READ MORE: Boris Johnson tries to heal Brexit rift with "fantastic" Ruth Davidson
Mr Johnson used his visit to call for a renewal of "the ties that bind our United Kingdom" and announced £300m for projects to boost the economy in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.
Mr Johnson previously claimed to have campaigned for the Union during the 2014, but did not in fact make campaign visits to Scotland at the time.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel